| From | Subject | Date |
|---|---|---|
| Mark Knecht | crash/dmesg - RAID locking up?
So I'm giving up on mdadm/RAID1/WD10EARS Green Drive experiment for
the next day or two. I've tried 4 times in the last two days to see if
I can get this machine to boot using RAID. I keep running into crashes
that look like the one below. I will try a non-RAID install and see if
the hardware is stable and then come back to this later if
appropriate.
I was running a March, 2010 Gentoo install CD when this happened. One
terminal doing bash completion of all things was hung with 1 CPU stuck
in a ...
| Mar 28, 3:31 pm 2010 |
| Mark Knecht | Re: New RAID1 machine "No bootable media"
Sorry for top-posting.
If it matters these are 4K sector drives. WD10EARS. Seems like I've
seen some threads about boot loaders, etc., not that I understood
them. I have booted these drives in non-RAID machines though.
- Mark
--
| Mar 28, 10:26 am 2010 |
| Mark Knecht | New RAID1 machine "No bootable media"
Hi,
I brought up new hardware yesterday for my first RAID install. I
followed this Gentoo page describing a software RAID1/LVM install:
http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/gentoo-x86+raid+lvm2-quickinstall.xml
Note that I followed this page verbatim, even if it wasn't what I
wanted, with exceptions:
a) My RAID1 is 3 drives instead of 2
b) I'm AMD64 Gentoo based.
c) I used grub-static
I did this install mostly just to get a first-hand feel for how to
do a RAID install and to try out ...
| Mar 28, 8:12 am 2010 |
| Piergiorgio Sartor | Re: metadata 1.2
That would be the easiest part.
Since the bootmanager should know how to boot, it will
know also where to look for the superblock and pass this
information to the kernel.
Or it would be possible to have some "fixed" place to look.
I think a reasonable solution is possible.
bye,
--
piergiorgio
--
| Mar 28, 12:22 am 2010 |
| Piergiorgio Sartor | Re: metadata 1.2
well, this is somehow following.
Since a bootmananger does not fit, why is this
space reserved at all...
I might understand the bootchain case, anyhow.
Thanks,
bye,
--
piergiorgio
--
| Mar 28, 12:20 am 2010 |
| Luca Berra | Re: metadata 1.2
this was discussed nearly one year ago.
look for the thread "md extension to support booting from raid whole
disks". Unfortunately that thread turned to an holy war. But before
that, Neil said he planned on offering an option to reserve some space,
the issue would be, how do you locate that piece of metadata?
L.
--
Luca Berra -- bluca@comedia.it
Communication Media & Services S.r.l.
/"\
\ / ASCII RIBBON CAMPAIGN
X AGAINST HTML MAIL
/ \
--
| Mar 27, 11:58 pm 2010 |
| Stefan *St0fF* Huebner | Re: Use of WD20EARS with MDADM
Just for those who like to read: ERC is a feature stated in the
ATA-specifications, that's why the "quick hack" for smartctl was so
easy. But in the specs it is also noted, that the change a
SCT-ERC-Command does will not survive a power cycle.
So y'all will probably need some udev-triggered daemon, which runs upon
connecting a disk, checking if this disk is conforming to the ata-spec,
then finding out if it's part of a raid array. If all answers yield
"yes", it should call SCT-ERC with a ...
| Mar 28, 9:19 am 2010 |
| Anshuman Aggarwal | Re: 4 partition raid 5 with 2 disks active and 2 spare, ...
Michael,
I am running mdadm 3.1.2 (latest stable I think) compiled from source (FYI on Ubuntu Karmic, 2.6.31-20-generic)
Here is what happened....the device /dev/sda1 has failed once, but I was wondering if it was a freak accident so I tried adding it back..and then it started resyncing ...somewhere in this process...the disk /dev/sda1 stalled and the server needed a reboot. After that boot, I got 2 spares (/dev/sda1, /dev/sdd5) and 2 active devices (/dev/sdb1, /dev/sdc1)
Maybe I need to do a ...
| Mar 28, 8:18 am 2010 |
| Anshuman Aggarwal | Re: 4 partition raid 5 with 2 disks active and 2 spare, ...
Some more info:
I did try this command with the following result:
mdadm --build -n 4 -l 5 -e1.2 --assume-clean /dev/md127 /dev/sda1 /dev/sdb5 /dev/sdc5 /dev/sdd5
mdadm: Raid level 5 not permitted with --build.
Should I try this?
Thanks--
| Mar 28, 9:35 am 2010 |
| previous day | today | next day |
|---|---|---|
| March 27, 2010 | March 28, 2010 | March 29, 2010 |
