linux-raid mailing list

FromSubjectsort iconDate
Mark Knecht
crash/dmesg - RAID locking up?
So I'm giving up on mdadm/RAID1/WD10EARS Green Drive experiment for the next day or two. I've tried 4 times in the last two days to see if I can get this machine to boot using RAID. I keep running into crashes that look like the one below. I will try a non-RAID install and see if the hardware is stable and then come back to this later if appropriate. I was running a March, 2010 Gentoo install CD when this happened. One terminal doing bash completion of all things was hung with 1 CPU stuck in a ...
Mar 28, 3:31 pm 2010
Mark Knecht
Re: New RAID1 machine "No bootable media"
Sorry for top-posting. If it matters these are 4K sector drives. WD10EARS. Seems like I've seen some threads about boot loaders, etc., not that I understood them. I have booted these drives in non-RAID machines though. - Mark --
Mar 28, 10:26 am 2010
Mark Knecht
New RAID1 machine "No bootable media"
Hi, I brought up new hardware yesterday for my first RAID install. I followed this Gentoo page describing a software RAID1/LVM install: http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/gentoo-x86+raid+lvm2-quickinstall.xml Note that I followed this page verbatim, even if it wasn't what I wanted, with exceptions: a) My RAID1 is 3 drives instead of 2 b) I'm AMD64 Gentoo based. c) I used grub-static I did this install mostly just to get a first-hand feel for how to do a RAID install and to try out ...
Mar 28, 8:12 am 2010
Piergiorgio Sartor
Re: metadata 1.2
That would be the easiest part. Since the bootmanager should know how to boot, it will know also where to look for the superblock and pass this information to the kernel. Or it would be possible to have some "fixed" place to look. I think a reasonable solution is possible. bye, -- piergiorgio --
Mar 28, 12:22 am 2010
Piergiorgio Sartor
Re: metadata 1.2
well, this is somehow following. Since a bootmananger does not fit, why is this space reserved at all... I might understand the bootchain case, anyhow. Thanks, bye, -- piergiorgio --
Mar 28, 12:20 am 2010
Luca Berra
Re: metadata 1.2
this was discussed nearly one year ago. look for the thread "md extension to support booting from raid whole disks". Unfortunately that thread turned to an holy war. But before that, Neil said he planned on offering an option to reserve some space, the issue would be, how do you locate that piece of metadata? L. -- Luca Berra -- bluca@comedia.it Communication Media & Services S.r.l. /"\ \ / ASCII RIBBON CAMPAIGN X AGAINST HTML MAIL / \ --
Mar 27, 11:58 pm 2010
Stefan *St0fF* Huebner
Re: Use of WD20EARS with MDADM
Just for those who like to read: ERC is a feature stated in the ATA-specifications, that's why the "quick hack" for smartctl was so easy. But in the specs it is also noted, that the change a SCT-ERC-Command does will not survive a power cycle. So y'all will probably need some udev-triggered daemon, which runs upon connecting a disk, checking if this disk is conforming to the ata-spec, then finding out if it's part of a raid array. If all answers yield "yes", it should call SCT-ERC with a ...
Mar 28, 9:19 am 2010
Anshuman Aggarwal
Re: 4 partition raid 5 with 2 disks active and 2 spare, ...
Michael, I am running mdadm 3.1.2 (latest stable I think) compiled from source (FYI on Ubuntu Karmic, 2.6.31-20-generic) Here is what happened....the device /dev/sda1 has failed once, but I was wondering if it was a freak accident so I tried adding it back..and then it started resyncing ...somewhere in this process...the disk /dev/sda1 stalled and the server needed a reboot. After that boot, I got 2 spares (/dev/sda1, /dev/sdd5) and 2 active devices (/dev/sdb1, /dev/sdc1) Maybe I need to do a ...
Mar 28, 8:18 am 2010
Anshuman Aggarwal
Re: 4 partition raid 5 with 2 disks active and 2 spare, ...
Some more info: I did try this command with the following result: mdadm --build -n 4 -l 5 -e1.2 --assume-clean /dev/md127 /dev/sda1 /dev/sdb5 /dev/sdc5 /dev/sdd5 mdadm: Raid level 5 not permitted with --build. Should I try this? Thanks--
Mar 28, 9:35 am 2010
previous daytodaynext day
March 27, 2010March 28, 2010March 29, 2010