| From | Subject | Date |
|---|---|---|
| Luca Berra | Re: mdadm+lvm2: ioctl error and cannot mount the device nodes?
who knows? you are providing no useful data at all.
L.
--
Luca Berra -- bluca@comedia.it
Communication Media & Services S.r.l.
/"\
\ / ASCII RIBBON CAMPAIGN
X AGAINST HTML MAIL
/ \
--
| Jul 3, 2:27 am 2009 |
| Luca Berra | Re: RAID6 questions
maybe because those suggesting this are not able to come up with a
This really depends on your priorities, i would have replaced my drives
well in advance of a similar situation.
The only reason i can imagine for splitting a disk into many partitions
and raiding them together is avoiding lenghty rebuilds when a single
drive is kicked from an array due to a correctable read error.
In practice the above scenario should not happen anymore, since md will
retry writing a stripe if it gets a read-error, be...
| Jul 3, 2:40 am 2009 |
| Goswin von Brederlow | Re: RAID6 questions
Plus bitmaps do that much better.
MfG
Goswin
--
| Jul 3, 4:24 am 2009 |
| Leslie Rhorer | RE: Adding a smaller drive
'Excellent point. If the spec calls for a minimum of sectors, then
it is quite possible a complaint drive might well have fewer sectors than
the ones I used to build the array. OTOH, all of the 1T drives on my
systems have precisely the same number of user available sectors, and all
the 1.5T drives have the same number. Since the drives represent not only
different models from one manufacturer but also different manufacturers,
this suggests to me an adherence to a specific spec. On yet the oth...
| Jul 3, 12:12 pm 2009 |
| Billy Crook | Re: Adding a smaller drive
My WDC WD20EADS-00R6B0 drives have 3907029168 512byte sectors for a
total of 2000398934016 bytes. I don't buy replacement drives for raid
arrays unless 1) they are the same model or 2) I check the sector
count. It's not a big deal to do. The first google result for "2tb
drive" has a picture of the label that clearly shows the number of
sectors. I'd rather do one comparison between exact numbers than look
for vague numbers and fine print compliance to some standard few if
any people have ever hear...
| Jul 3, 1:23 pm 2009 |
| Leslie Rhorer | RE: Adding a smaller drive
So a company like Apple could never compete with IBM?
There are myriad examples of non-compliant software and hardware
being developed in a standards-based environment yet selling very well. I
think maybe you are underestimating the vast buying power of individual
consumers and non-enterprise businesses. The consumer sector has much
different requirements than industry, government, or the military. If a
non-compliant product is less expensive than a compliant one, it will often
nonetheless s...
| Jul 3, 11:46 am 2009 |
| previous day | today | next day |
|---|---|---|
| July 2, 2009 | July 3, 2009 | July 4, 2009 |
| Greg Kroah-Hartman | [PATCH 002/196] Chinese: rephrase English introduction in HOWTO |
| Tarkan Erimer | Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3 |
| Roland Dreier | Re: Integration of SCST in the mainstream Linux kernel |
git: | |
| Radu Rendec | htb parallelism on multi-core platforms |
| David Miller | Re: [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
| David Miller | [GIT]: Networking |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 27/37] dccp: Integration of dynamic feature activation - part 2 (server side) |
