On Thu, Jul 02, 2009 at 05:22:54PM +0200, Marek wrote:maybe because those suggesting this are not able to come up with a reasonable explanation? This really depends on your priorities, i would have replaced my drives well in advance of a similar situation. The only reason i can imagine for splitting a disk into many partitions and raiding them together is avoiding lenghty rebuilds when a single drive is kicked from an array due to a correctable read error. In practice the above scenario should not happen anymore, since md will retry writing a stripe if it gets a read-error, besides you are planning on using raid6, so a single drive failure will still leave you with a nice degree of protection. Regards, L. -- Luca Berra -- bluca@comedia.it Communication Media & Services S.r.l. /"\ \ / ASCII RIBBON CAMPAIGN X AGAINST HTML MAIL / \ -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
| Andrew Morton | -mm merge plans for 2.6.23 |
| Greg KH | [GIT PATCH] driver core patches against 2.6.24 |
| Bart Van Assche | Integration of SCST in the mainstream Linux kernel |
| david | Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3 |
| Jarek Poplawski | [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 03/37] dccp: List management for new feature negotiation |
| Arjan van de Ven | Re: [GIT]: Networking |
| Auke Kok | [PATCH] e1000e: test MSI interrupts |
git: | |
