Re: [PATCH] xps-mq: Transmit Packet Steering for multiqueue

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Tom Herbert
Date: Thursday, September 2, 2010 - 12:52 pm

> userland folks who actually try to exploit the MQ/MSIX-ness will almost
I don't really see that.  Pinning is a last resort and in this context
we could only do that on a dedicated server.  On a shared server, with
many different apps, pinning for MQ/MSIX is not an easy option;
meeting scheduler constraints will be the first priority and its up to
networking to work with the scheduler to to the right thing.
Scheduler aware networking (or vice versa) is important.

Tom
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[PATCH] xps-mq: Transmit Packet Steering for multiqueue, Tom Herbert, (Sun Aug 22, 10:39 pm)
Re: [PATCH] xps-mq: Transmit Packet Steering for multiqueue, Stephen Hemminger, (Mon Aug 23, 10:59 am)
Re: [PATCH] xps-mq: Transmit Packet Steering for multiqueue, Stephen Hemminger, (Wed Sep 1, 6:48 pm)
Re: [PATCH] xps-mq: Transmit Packet Steering for multiqueue, Stephen Hemminger, (Wed Sep 1, 6:56 pm)
Re: [PATCH] xps-mq: Transmit Packet Steering for multiqueue, Tom Herbert, (Thu Sep 2, 12:52 pm)
Re: [PATCH] xps-mq: Transmit Packet Steering for multiqueue, Michael S. Tsirkin, (Sun Sep 19, 10:24 am)
[RFC][PATCH 1/3] IRQ: Add irq_get_numa_node(), Ben Hutchings, (Mon Sep 20, 5:44 am)
[RFC][PATCH 2/3] ethtool: NUMA affinity control, Ben Hutchings, (Mon Sep 20, 5:45 am)
Re: [RFC][PATCH 1/3] IRQ: Add irq_get_numa_node(), Eric Dumazet, (Mon Sep 20, 6:04 am)