On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 12:35 PM, Jesse Gross <jesse@nicira.com> wrote:
quoted text > On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 1:16 PM, Steve Chen <schen@mvista.com> wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 7:06 PM, David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> wrote:
>> > From: Steve Chen <schen@mvista.com>
>> > Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2010 13:35:14 -0500
>> >
>> >> I trace through the code. It appears that the network driver (e1000e
>> >> for my setup) always set ip_summed to CHECKSUM_UNNECESSARY. I have
>> >> been unsuccessful to get the driver to take the other branch where
>> >> ip_summed is set to CHECKSUM_COMPLETE. Even when I hard code
>> >> ip_summed to CHECKSUM_COMPLETE, __skb_checksum_complete_head set
>> >> ip_summed to CHECKSUM_UNNECESSARY after recomputing the checksum.
>> >>
>> >> So far the only way I'm able to get ICMP to recompute checksum is
>> >> through the attached hack. Even though I can get all the tests to
>> >> pass, but it just seem wrong.
>> >
>> > If turning off hardware RX checksumming with ethtool has no effect,
>> > and the problem is seen with multiple ethernet cards, the problem
>> > is elsewhere.
>> >
>> > First of all, if you turn RX checksumming off, the checksum field
>> > of the SKB should always be skb->ip_summed = 0. If this is not
>> > happening, find out why.
>>
>> Ahhh, thats my problem. I incorrectly thought the ip_summed should be
>> 2. The ip_summed is set to 1 in
>> __skb_checksum_complete_head. Looking at the code, shouldn't
>>
>> if (likely(!sum))
>>
>> be
>>
>> if (likely(sum))
>>
>> Since sum == 0 would indicate an error?
>
> sum == 0 indicates that the checksum is correct.
> If you compute the checksum of a packet containing the correct checksum the
> result is 0. It's like a slightly more complicated varient of a parity bit.
It appears the issue lies somewhere within CONNTRACK. A co-worker
tested with CONNTRACK disable, and the test passed. Looks like I have
a bit of homework to do. Thank you for all the helpful hints that got
me this far.
Steve
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to
majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at
http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
