From: jamal <hadi@cyberus.ca>
Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2010 09:53:09 -0400

quoted text
> On Wed, 2010-08-18 at 21:18 +0800, Changli Gao wrote:
> 
>> I had gone through the code before submitting this code. But it isn't
>> easy to test if it breaks sth. 
> 
> That works well actually and it is the LinuxWay(tm);-> 
> 
>> Would you please give a case to test ?
> 
> Just conformance testing. Since you added new AH SPI behavior
> at least find some use case of what people normally use and make sure it
> isnt broken. But if youve looked at code sufficiently i think thats good
> enough.

I agree and I've applied his patch.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html