Re: Re: why do we need printk on sending syn flood cookie?

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Franchoze Eric
Date: Monday, August 2, 2010 - 9:11 am

02.08.10, 12:17, "Florian Westphal" <fw@strlen.de>:


For now I see "possible SYN flooding on port %d. Sending cookies.\n" message each second on my server. I know that there are a lot of SYNs and I know that kernel sends cookie. Why do I need so mach printk?
So I suggested add new value to /proc/sys/net/ipv4/tcp_syncookies, which will enable cookie but this printk will be turned off.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
why do we need printk on sending syn flood cookie?, Franchoze Eric, (Mon Aug 2, 12:58 am)
Re: why do we need printk on sending syn flood cookie?, Florian Westphal, (Mon Aug 2, 1:17 am)
Re: Re: why do we need printk on sending syn flood cookie?, Franchoze Eric, (Mon Aug 2, 9:11 am)
Re: why do we need printk on sending syn flood cookie?, Mitchell Erblich, (Mon Aug 2, 11:10 am)
Re: why do we need printk on sending syn flood cookie?, Mitchell Erblich, (Mon Aug 2, 3:30 pm)
Re: why do we need printk on sending syn flood cookie?, Mitchell Erblich, (Mon Aug 2, 3:49 pm)