Re: [RFC 1/1] netfilter: xtables: inclusion of xt_condition

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Jan Engelhardt
Date: Thursday, July 22, 2010 - 7:44 am

On Thursday 2010-07-22 16:09, Luciano Coelho wrote:

Cc'ing Alexey who has done the netns support.

Alexey, you added par->net, but given Luciano just did it with 
current->nsproxy->net_ns, do we really need par->net?



newline before return.



I don't think we need this level of granularity; let the options be 
global, similar to what xt_hashlimit does.
(I am not even sure if kp->arg can be non-multiples-of-4, in which case 
this would be an alignment violation even.)


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[RFC 1/1] netfilter: xtables: inclusion of xt_condition, Luciano Coelho, (Thu Jul 22, 7:09 am)
Re: [RFC 1/1] netfilter: xtables: inclusion of xt_condition, Jan Engelhardt, (Thu Jul 22, 7:44 am)
Re: [RFC 1/1] netfilter: xtables: inclusion of xt_condition, Alexey Dobriyan, (Thu Jul 22, 12:19 pm)
Re: [RFC 1/1] netfilter: xtables: inclusion of xt_condition, Luciano Coelho, (Thu Jul 22, 12:26 pm)
Re: [RFC 1/1] netfilter: xtables: inclusion of xt_condition, Luciano Coelho, (Thu Jul 22, 12:30 pm)