> Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 02:53:17PM CEST,
kaber@trash.net wrote:
>
>> Jiri Pirko wrote:
>>
>>> Apart your patch doesn't remove option from defconfigs (not sure if that's
>>> necessary or not), your patch also do not print warning in connbytes_mt_init.
>>> That would make connbytes silently non-functional. Therefore I think my patch is
>>> better (more complete).
>>>
>> The patch I have queued is automatically enabling accounting when
>> the connbytes match is used and is printing a warning.
>>
>
> ok, that looks fine to me. What about those config options in def_config files?
>
