[net-next-2.6 PATCH v2] x86: Align skb w/ start of cacheline on newer core 2/Xeon Arch

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Jeff Kirsher
Date: Tuesday, June 29, 2010 - 9:38 pm

From: Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@intel.com>

x86 architectures can handle unaligned accesses in hardware, and it has
been shown that unaligned DMA accesses can be expensive on Nehalem
architectures.  As such we should overwrite NET_IP_ALIGN to resolve
this issue.

Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: x86@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com>
---

 arch/x86/include/asm/system.h |    9 +++++++++
 1 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/system.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/system.h
index b8fe48e..b4293fc 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/system.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/system.h
@@ -457,4 +457,13 @@ static inline void rdtsc_barrier(void)
 	alternative(ASM_NOP3, "lfence", X86_FEATURE_LFENCE_RDTSC);
 }
 
+#ifdef CONFIG_MCORE2
+/*
+ * We handle most unaligned accesses in hardware.  On the other hand
+ * unaligned DMA can be quite expensive on some Nehalem processors.
+ *
+ * Based on this we disable the IP header alignment in network drivers.
+ */
+#define NET_IP_ALIGN	0
+#endif
 #endif /* _ASM_X86_SYSTEM_H */

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[net-next-2.6 PATCH v2] x86: Align skb w/ start of cacheli ..., Jeff Kirsher, (Tue Jun 29, 9:38 pm)