Re: [PATCH] IP: Increment INADDRERRORS if routing for a packet is not successful

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Eric Dumazet
Date: Wednesday, June 2, 2010 - 11:41 am

Le mercredi 02 juin 2010 à 13:01 -0500, Christoph Lameter a écrit :

Unicast trafic dont need a reverse route, if you only receive packets.

rp_filter is an optional check, not covered by standard MIBS, so its
borderline.



yeah, I know about this problem, and am working on it too...


Its clearly a case were rp_filter should be set to 2, dont you think ?


In standard RFC ? I wont change it :)


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: [PATCH] IP: Increment INADDRERRORS if routing for a pa ..., Christoph Lameter, (Wed Jun 2, 11:01 am)
Re: [PATCH] IP: Increment INADDRERRORS if routing for a pa ..., Eric Dumazet, (Wed Jun 2, 11:41 am)
Re: [PATCH] IP: Increment INADDRERRORS if routing for a pa ..., Christoph Lameter, (Wed Jun 2, 11:59 am)