Re: [PATCH] vlan_dev: VLAN 0 should be treated as "no vlan tag" (802.1p packet)

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Eric Dumazet
Date: Monday, June 14, 2010 - 12:12 pm

Le lundi 14 juin 2010 à 19:11 +0200, Patrick McHardy a écrit :

Pedro, we have two kind of vlan setups :

accelerated and non accelerated ones.

Your patch address non accelated ones only, since you only touch
vlan_skb_recv()

Accelerated vlan can follow these paths :

1) NAPI devices

vlan_gro_receive() -> vlan_gro_common()

2) non NAPI devices

__vlan_hwaccel_rx() 

So you might also patch __vlan_hwaccel_rx() and vlan_gro_common()

Please merge following bits to your patch submission :

http://kerneltrap.org/mailarchive/linux-netdev/2010/5/23/6277868


Good luck for your first patch !


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: [PATCH] vlan_dev: VLAN 0 should be treated as "no vlan ..., Eric Dumazet, (Mon Jun 14, 12:12 pm)
Re: [PATCH] vlan_dev: VLAN 0 should be treated as "no vlan ..., Pedro Garcia Pelaez, (Thu Jun 24, 11:28 am)
[BUG net-next-2.6] vlan, bonding, bnx2 problems, Eric Dumazet, (Mon Jul 19, 6:24 am)
Re: [BUG net-next-2.6] vlan, bonding, bnx2 problems, David Miller, (Mon Jul 19, 9:35 am)
Re: [BUG net-next-2.6] vlan, bonding, bnx2 problems, Michael Chan, (Mon Jul 19, 11:14 am)
Re: [BUG net-next-2.6] vlan, bonding, bnx2 problems, Jay Vosburgh, (Mon Jul 19, 1:19 pm)
Re: [BUG net-next-2.6] vlan, bonding, bnx2 problems, Jay Vosburgh, (Tue Jul 20, 3:58 pm)