Re: [PATCH] vlan_dev: VLAN 0 should be treated as "no vlan tag" (802.1p packet)

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Patrick McHardy
Date: Monday, June 14, 2010 - 10:11 am

Ben Hutchings wrote:

Additionally:

- please use the proper comment style, meaning each line begins
  with a '*'

- the pr_debug statements may be useful for debugging, but are
  a bit excessive for the final version

- + /* 2010-06-13: Pedro Garcia

   We have changelogs for this, simply explaining what the code
   does is enough.

- Please CC the maintainer (which is me)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: [PATCH] vlan_dev: VLAN 0 should be treated as "no vlan ..., Patrick McHardy, (Mon Jun 14, 10:11 am)
Re: [PATCH] vlan_dev: VLAN 0 should be treated as "no vlan ..., Pedro Garcia Pelaez, (Thu Jun 24, 11:28 am)
[BUG net-next-2.6] vlan, bonding, bnx2 problems, Eric Dumazet, (Mon Jul 19, 6:24 am)
Re: [BUG net-next-2.6] vlan, bonding, bnx2 problems, David Miller, (Mon Jul 19, 9:35 am)
Re: [BUG net-next-2.6] vlan, bonding, bnx2 problems, Michael Chan, (Mon Jul 19, 11:14 am)
Re: [BUG net-next-2.6] vlan, bonding, bnx2 problems, Jay Vosburgh, (Mon Jul 19, 1:19 pm)
Re: [BUG net-next-2.6] vlan, bonding, bnx2 problems, Jay Vosburgh, (Tue Jul 20, 3:58 pm)