Home » Mailing list archives » linux-netdev » 2010 » June » 14

Re: [PATCH] vlan_dev: VLAN 0 should be treated as "no vlan tag" (802.1p packet)

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
[view in full thread]
From: Ben Hutchings
Subject: Re: [PATCH] vlan_dev: VLAN 0 should be treated as "no vlan tag" (802.1p packet)
Date: Monday, June 14, 2010 - 10:02 am

On Mon, 2010-06-14 at 18:49 +0200, Pedro Garcia wrote:
[...]

Sorry, no you haven't.

- Networking changes go through David Miller's net-next-2.6 tree so you
need to use that as the baseline, not 2.6.26
- Patches should be applicable with -p1, not -p0 (so if you use diff,
you should run it from one directory level up)
- The patch was word-wrapped

Ben.

-- 
Ben Hutchings, Senior Software Engineer, Solarflare Communications
Not speaking for my employer; that's the marketing department's job.
They asked us to note that Solarflare product names are trademarked.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
Messages in current thread:
[PATCH] vlan_dev: VLAN 0 should be treated as "no vlan tag ..., Pedro Garcia, (Sun Jun 13, 12:20 pm)
Re: [PATCH] vlan_dev: VLAN 0 should be treated as "no vlan ..., Ben Hutchings, (Sun Jun 13, 2:56 pm)
Re: [PATCH] vlan_dev: VLAN 0 should be treated as "no vlan ..., Pedro Garcia, (Mon Jun 14, 9:49 am)
Re: [PATCH] vlan_dev: VLAN 0 should be treated as "no vlan ..., Ben Hutchings, (Mon Jun 14, 10:02 am)
Re: [PATCH] vlan_dev: VLAN 0 should be treated as "no vlan ..., Patrick McHardy, (Mon Jun 14, 10:11 am)
Re: [PATCH] vlan_dev: VLAN 0 should be treated as "no vlan ..., Eric Dumazet, (Mon Jun 14, 12:12 pm)
Re: [PATCH] vlan_dev: VLAN 0 should be treated as "no vlan ..., Joe Perches, (Mon Jun 14, 12:42 pm)
Re: [PATCH] vlan_dev: VLAN 0 should be treated as "no vlan ..., Eric Dumazet, (Mon Jun 14, 1:03 pm)
Re: [PATCH] vlan_dev: VLAN 0 should be treated as "no vlan ..., Pedro Garcia, (Wed Jun 16, 1:49 am)
Re: [PATCH] vlan_dev: VLAN 0 should be treated as "no vlan ..., Eric Dumazet, (Wed Jun 16, 2:08 am)
Re: [PATCH] vlan_dev: VLAN 0 should be treated as "no vlan ..., Patrick McHardy, (Wed Jun 16, 4:42 am)
Re: [PATCH] vlan_dev: VLAN 0 should be treated as "no vlan ..., Pedro Garcia, (Wed Jun 16, 6:28 am)
Re: [PATCH] vlan_dev: VLAN 0 should be treated as "no vlan ..., Arnd Bergmann, (Wed Jun 16, 7:24 am)
Re: [PATCH] vlan_dev: VLAN 0 should be treated as "no vlan ..., Eric Dumazet, (Wed Jun 16, 7:24 am)
Re: [PATCH] vlan_dev: VLAN 0 should be treated as "no vlan ..., Patrick McHardy, (Wed Jun 16, 8:28 am)
Re: [PATCH] vlan_dev: VLAN 0 should be treated as "no vlan ..., Arnd Bergmann, (Wed Jun 16, 11:26 am)
Re: [PATCH] vlan_dev: VLAN 0 should be treated as "no vlan ..., Eric Dumazet, (Wed Jun 16, 11:58 am)
RE: [PATCH] vlan_dev: VLAN 0 should be treated as "no vlan ..., Vladislav Zolotarov, (Thu Jun 17, 1:56 am)
RE: [PATCH] vlan_dev: VLAN 0 should be treated as "no vlan ..., Eric Dumazet, (Thu Jun 17, 3:28 am)
RE: [PATCH] vlan_dev: VLAN 0 should be treated as "no vlan ..., Vladislav Zolotarov, (Thu Jun 17, 7:08 am)
Re: [PATCH] vlan_dev: VLAN 0 should be treated as "no vlan ..., Pedro Garcia Pelaez, (Thu Jun 24, 11:28 am)
Re: [PATCH] vlan_dev: VLAN 0 should be treated as "no vlan ..., Pedro Garcia, (Sun Jun 27, 4:21 pm)
Re: [PATCH] vlan_dev: VLAN 0 should be treated as "no vlan ..., David Miller, (Wed Jun 30, 1:16 pm)
Re: [PATCH] vlan_dev: VLAN 0 should be treated as "no vlan ..., Pedro Garcia, (Thu Jul 1, 11:47 am)
Re: [PATCH] vlan_dev: VLAN 0 should be treated as "no vlan ..., Eric Dumazet, (Thu Jul 1, 1:19 pm)
RE: [PATCH] vlan_dev: VLAN 0 should be treated as "no vlan ..., Vladislav Zolotarov, (Thu Jul 8, 5:54 am)
RE: [PATCH] vlan_dev: VLAN 0 should be treated as "no vlan ..., Vladislav Zolotarov, (Thu Jul 8, 5:58 am)
RE: [PATCH] vlan_dev: VLAN 0 should be treated as "no vlan ..., Vladislav Zolotarov, (Thu Jul 8, 6:51 am)
Re: [PATCH] vlan_dev: VLAN 0 should be treated as "no vlan ..., Pedro Garcia, (Sun Jul 18, 9:43 am)
Re: [PATCH] vlan_dev: VLAN 0 should be treated as "no vlan ..., David Miller, (Sun Jul 18, 3:39 pm)
[BUG net-next-2.6] vlan, bonding, bnx2 problems, Eric Dumazet, (Mon Jul 19, 6:24 am)
Re: [BUG net-next-2.6] vlan, bonding, bnx2 problems, David Miller, (Mon Jul 19, 9:35 am)
Re: [BUG net-next-2.6] vlan, bonding, bnx2 problems, Michael Chan, (Mon Jul 19, 11:14 am)
Re: [BUG net-next-2.6] vlan, bonding, bnx2 problems, Jay Vosburgh, (Mon Jul 19, 1:19 pm)
Re: [BUG net-next-2.6] vlan, bonding, bnx2 problems, Jay Vosburgh, (Tue Jul 20, 3:58 pm)