On 5/6/10 6:47 AM, "Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@arndb.de> wrote:

quoted text
> On Thursday 06 May 2010, Scott Feldman wrote:
>> @@ -810,14 +819,24 @@ static void enic_reset_mcaddrs(struct enic *enic)
>>  
>>  static int enic_set_mac_addr(struct net_device *netdev, char *addr)
>>  {
>> -       if (!is_valid_ether_addr(addr))
>> -               return -EADDRNOTAVAIL;
>> +       struct enic *enic = netdev_priv(netdev);
>>  
>> -       memcpy(netdev->dev_addr, addr, netdev->addr_len);
>> +       if (enic_is_dynamic(enic)) {
>> +               random_ether_addr(netdev->dev_addr);
>> +       } else {
>> +               if (!is_valid_ether_addr(addr))
>> +                       return -EADDRNOTAVAIL;
>> +               memcpy(netdev->dev_addr, addr, netdev->addr_len);
>> +       }
>>  
>>         return 0;
>>  }
>>  
>> +static int enic_set_mac_address(struct net_device *netdev, void *p)
>> +{
>> +       return -EOPNOTSUPP;
>> +}
>> +
>>  /* netif_tx_lock held, BHs disabled */
>>  static void enic_set_multicast_list(struct net_device *netdev)
>>  {
> 
> Thsi looks funny. So you just ignore the address that gets passed to
> enic_set_mac_addr for dynamic interfaces and instead set a random
> address?

Dynamic enics have all-zero mac address on init, so we assign a random mac
addr to the interface.  This would seem less funny:

    if (enic_is_dynamic(enic) && is_zero_ether_addr(addr))
        random_ether_addr(netdev->dev_addr);
    else
        ...

I'll make that change and resubmit with your VDP additions if you like.

-scott

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html