Re: Question about netns & AF_UNIX

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Martín Ferrari
Date: Monday, May 31, 2010 - 2:19 am

Hi,

On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 20:08, Dan Smith <danms@us.ibm.com> wrote:


To me it was the opposite, I thought natural that UNIX sockets would
continue to work, at least when they are bound to a filesystem entry.
Also it is a nice and clean way to communicate across namespaces
without assuming lots of things about the network configuration.


Yes, today I've tried with named pipes and worked. It's just that they
aren't as nice as UNIX sockets :)

Thanks.



-- 
Martín Ferrari
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Question about netns &amp; AF_UNIX, Martín Ferrari, (Thu May 27, 7:38 am)
Re: Question about netns &amp; AF_UNIX, Dan Smith, (Thu May 27, 11:08 am)
Re: Question about netns &amp; AF_UNIX, Daniel Lezcano, (Thu May 27, 1:16 pm)
Re: Question about netns & AF_UNIX, Martín Ferrari, (Mon May 31, 2:19 am)