Re: RX/close vcc race with solos/atmtcp/usbatm/he

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: David Miller
Date: Friday, May 28, 2010 - 3:46 am

From: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
Date: Wed, 26 May 2010 12:16:24 +0100


There is no doubt in my mind that these VCC objects need to be
refcounted when used like this.

The only other alternative is to make use of something like RCU.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
RX/close vcc race with solos/atmtcp/usbatm/he, David Woodhouse, (Wed May 26, 4:16 am)
Re: [Linux-ATM-General] RX/close vcc race with solos/atmtc ..., Stanislaw Gruszka, (Wed May 26, 11:51 am)
Re: RX/close vcc race with solos/atmtcp/usbatm/he, David Miller, (Fri May 28, 3:46 am)
Re: RX/close vcc race with solos/atmtcp/usbatm/he, David Woodhouse, (Fri May 28, 6:33 am)
Re: RX/close vcc race with solos/atmtcp/usbatm/he, David Woodhouse, (Mon Jun 7, 3:02 am)
Re: RX/close vcc race with solos/atmtcp/usbatm/he, Nathan Williams, (Tue Jun 15, 5:33 pm)
Re: RX/close vcc race with solos/atmtcp/usbatm/he, Nathan Williams, (Tue Jul 27, 4:12 pm)