From: Scott Feldman <scofeldm@cisco.com>
The wrong size was being calculated for vfinfo. In one case, it was over-
calculating using nlmsg_total_size on attrs, in another case, it was
under-calculating by assuming ifla_vf_* structs are packed together, but
each struct is it's own attr w/ hdr (and padding).
Signed-off-by: Scott Feldman <scofeldm@cisco.com>
---
net/core/rtnetlink.c | 11 ++++++-----
1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/core/rtnetlink.c b/net/core/rtnetlink.c
index 7331bb2..1a2af24 100644
--- a/net/core/rtnetlink.c
+++ b/net/core/rtnetlink.c
@@ -650,11 +650,12 @@ static inline int rtnl_vfinfo_size(const struct net_device *dev)
if (dev->dev.parent && dev_is_pci(dev->dev.parent)) {
int num_vfs = dev_num_vf(dev->dev.parent);
- size_t size = nlmsg_total_size(sizeof(struct nlattr));
- size += nlmsg_total_size(num_vfs * sizeof(struct nlattr));
- size += num_vfs * (sizeof(struct ifla_vf_mac) +
- sizeof(struct ifla_vf_vlan) +
- sizeof(struct ifla_vf_tx_rate));
+ size_t size = nla_total_size(sizeof(struct nlattr));
+ size += nla_total_size(num_vfs * sizeof(struct nlattr));
+ size += num_vfs *
+ (nla_total_size(sizeof(struct ifla_vf_mac)) +
+ nla_total_size(sizeof(struct ifla_vf_vlan)) +
+ nla_total_size(sizeof(struct ifla_vf_tx_rate)));
return size;
} else
return 0;
--
