Re: cls_cgroup: Store classid in struct sock

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Herbert Xu
Date: Sunday, May 23, 2010 - 10:42 pm

On Sat, May 22, 2010 at 08:26:32AM -0400, Neil Horman wrote:

No I don't think you need an attach method.

The task_struct has a pointer to the cgroups, which in turn has
a pointer to the cgroup_subsys_state that we allocated in the
cls_cgroup module.

Did you try building cls_cgroup into the kernel?

Perhaps there is a bug in how we register it at run-time, or
perhaps the cgroups infrastructure itself is buggy.

Cheers,
-- 
Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/
Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
tun: Use netif_receive_skb instead of netif_rx, Herbert Xu, (Wed May 19, 12:57 am)
Re: tun: Use netif_receive_skb instead of netif_rx, Eric Dumazet, (Wed May 19, 1:09 am)
Re: tun: Use netif_receive_skb instead of netif_rx, Eric Dumazet, (Wed May 19, 1:18 am)
Re: tun: Use netif_receive_skb instead of netif_rx, Herbert Xu, (Wed May 19, 1:20 am)
Re: tun: Use netif_receive_skb instead of netif_rx, Herbert Xu, (Wed May 19, 1:21 am)
Re: tun: Use netif_receive_skb instead of netif_rx, Eric Dumazet, (Wed May 19, 1:27 am)
Re: tun: Use netif_receive_skb instead of netif_rx, Herbert Xu, (Wed May 19, 1:44 am)
Re: tun: Use netif_receive_skb instead of netif_rx, Neil Horman, (Wed May 19, 5:05 am)
Re: tun: Use netif_receive_skb instead of netif_rx, Neil Horman, (Wed May 19, 5:55 am)
Re: tun: Use netif_receive_skb instead of netif_rx, Eric Dumazet, (Wed May 19, 7:10 am)
Re: tun: Use netif_receive_skb instead of netif_rx, Neil Horman, (Wed May 19, 7:31 am)
Re: tun: Use netif_receive_skb instead of netif_rx, Neil Horman, (Wed May 19, 11:00 am)
Re: tun: Use netif_receive_skb instead of netif_rx, David Miller, (Wed May 19, 1:14 pm)
Re: tun: Use netif_receive_skb instead of netif_rx, Neil Horman, (Wed May 19, 1:24 pm)
Re: tun: Use netif_receive_skb instead of netif_rx, Thomas Graf, (Wed May 19, 1:49 pm)
Re: tun: Use netif_receive_skb instead of netif_rx, Brian Bloniarz, (Wed May 19, 2:00 pm)
Re: tun: Use netif_receive_skb instead of netif_rx, David Miller, (Wed May 19, 7:55 pm)
Re: tun: Use netif_receive_skb instead of netif_rx, Herbert Xu, (Wed May 19, 7:57 pm)
Re: tun: Use netif_receive_skb instead of netif_rx, David Miller, (Wed May 19, 8:05 pm)
Re: tun: Use netif_receive_skb instead of netif_rx, Herbert Xu, (Wed May 19, 8:34 pm)
Re: tun: Use netif_receive_skb instead of netif_rx, Herbert Xu, (Wed May 19, 8:42 pm)
Re: tun: Use netif_receive_skb instead of netif_rx, David Miller, (Wed May 19, 8:46 pm)
Re: tun: Use netif_receive_skb instead of netif_rx, Eric Dumazet, (Wed May 19, 9:54 pm)
Re: tun: Use netif_receive_skb instead of netif_rx, Herbert Xu, (Wed May 19, 10:01 pm)
Re: tun: Use netif_receive_skb instead of netif_rx, Eric Dumazet, (Wed May 19, 10:15 pm)
Re: tun: Use netif_receive_skb instead of netif_rx, Herbert Xu, (Wed May 19, 10:20 pm)
Re: tun: Use netif_receive_skb instead of netif_rx, Eric Dumazet, (Wed May 19, 10:36 pm)
Re: tun: Use netif_receive_skb instead of netif_rx, Herbert Xu, (Wed May 19, 10:46 pm)
Re: tun: Use netif_receive_skb instead of netif_rx, Eric Dumazet, (Wed May 19, 11:03 pm)
Re: tun: Use netif_receive_skb instead of netif_rx, Herbert Xu, (Wed May 19, 11:11 pm)
Re: tun: Use netif_receive_skb instead of netif_rx, Herbert Xu, (Wed May 19, 11:19 pm)
Re: tun: Use netif_receive_skb instead of netif_rx, Herbert Xu, (Wed May 19, 11:52 pm)
Re: tun: Use netif_receive_skb instead of netif_rx, Thomas Graf, (Thu May 20, 1:10 am)
Re: tun: Use netif_receive_skb instead of netif_rx, Thomas Graf, (Thu May 20, 2:40 am)
Re: tun: Use netif_receive_skb instead of netif_rx, Neil Horman, (Thu May 20, 10:29 am)
Re: tun: Use netif_receive_skb instead of netif_rx, Herbert Xu, (Thu May 20, 4:16 pm)
Re: tun: Use netif_receive_skb instead of netif_rx, Neil Horman, (Thu May 20, 5:39 pm)
Re: tun: Use netif_receive_skb instead of netif_rx, Herbert Xu, (Thu May 20, 6:02 pm)
Re: tun: Use netif_receive_skb instead of netif_rx, Herbert Xu, (Thu May 20, 6:16 pm)
Re: tun: Use netif_receive_skb instead of netif_rx, David Miller, (Thu May 20, 10:49 pm)
Re: tun: Use netif_receive_skb instead of netif_rx, Neil Horman, (Fri May 21, 3:51 am)
Re: tun: Use netif_receive_skb instead of netif_rx, Herbert Xu, (Fri May 21, 4:08 am)
Re: tun: Use netif_receive_skb instead of netif_rx, Neil Horman, (Fri May 21, 5:59 am)
Re: tun: Use netif_receive_skb instead of netif_rx, Neil Horman, (Fri May 21, 9:40 am)
cls_cgroup: Store classid in struct sock, Herbert Xu, (Fri May 21, 6:49 pm)
Re: cls_cgroup: Store classid in struct sock, Neil Horman, (Sat May 22, 5:26 am)
Re: cls_cgroup: Store classid in struct sock, Herbert Xu, (Sun May 23, 10:42 pm)
Re: tun: Use netif_receive_skb instead of netif_rx, David Miller, (Sun May 23, 11:44 pm)
Re: tun: Use netif_receive_skb instead of netif_rx, David Miller, (Sun May 23, 11:44 pm)
Re: cls_cgroup: Store classid in struct sock, David Miller, (Sun May 23, 11:44 pm)
Re: cls_cgroup: Store classid in struct sock, David Miller, (Sun May 23, 11:55 pm)
Re: cls_cgroup: Store classid in struct sock, Herbert Xu, (Mon May 24, 12:07 am)
Re: cls_cgroup: Store classid in struct sock, David Miller, (Mon May 24, 12:14 am)
Re: cls_cgroup: Store classid in struct sock, Neil Horman, (Mon May 24, 4:09 am)
Re: cls_cgroup: Store classid in struct sock, Herbert Xu, (Mon May 24, 4:24 am)