Re: [RFC] netem: correlated loss generation (v3)

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Hagen Paul Pfeifer
Date: Wednesday, May 19, 2010 - 5:43 pm

* Stephen Hemminger | 2010-05-19 17:17:33 [-0700]:


Is this really necessary? The right thing is to fix the broken behavior! If
the new patch provides this, great.  Imaging a network analysis for a PhD
dissertation based on a broken correlation algorithm - the whole results are
misleading and wrong. No one deserves this ... ;-)

If the current algorithm is broken then the mechanism must be fixed. Preserve
compatibility is counterproductive in this case.


Not at the moment, looks clear and understandable.


Cheers, Hagen

-- 
Hagen Paul Pfeifer <hagen@jauu.net>  ||  http://jauu.net/
Telephone: +49 174 5455209           ||  Key Id: 0x98350C22
Key Fingerprint: 490F 557B 6C48 6D7E 5706 2EA2 4A22 8D45 9835 0C22

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[RFC] netem: correlated loss generation (v3), Stephen Hemminger, (Mon May 17, 8:56 pm)
Re: [RFC] netem: correlated loss generation (v3), Eric Dumazet, (Mon May 17, 10:19 pm)
Re: [RFC] netem: correlated loss generation (v3), Hagen Paul Pfeifer, (Wed May 19, 2:42 pm)
Re: [RFC] netem: correlated loss generation (v3), Stefano Salsano, (Wed May 19, 3:52 pm)
Re: [RFC] netem: correlated loss generation (v3), Hagen Paul Pfeifer, (Wed May 19, 4:04 pm)
Re: [RFC] netem: correlated loss generation (v3), Stephen Hemminger, (Wed May 19, 5:17 pm)
Re: [RFC] netem: correlated loss generation (v3), Stefano Salsano, (Wed May 19, 5:22 pm)
Re: [RFC] netem: correlated loss generation (v3), Hagen Paul Pfeifer, (Wed May 19, 5:43 pm)