On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 08:05:47AM -0400, Neil Horman wrote:
quoted text
> On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 10:18:09AM +0200, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> > Le mercredi 19 mai 2010 à 10:09 +0200, Eric Dumazet a écrit :
> > 
> > > Another concern I have is about RPS.
> > > 
> > > netif_receive_skb() must be called from process_backlog() context, or
> > > there is no guarantee the IPI will be sent if this skb is enqueued for
> > > another cpu.
> > 
> > Hmm, I just checked again, and this is wrong.
> > 
> > In case we enqueue skb on a remote cpu backlog, we also
> > do __raise_softirq_irqoff(NET_RX_SOFTIRQ); so the IPI will be done
> > later.
> > 
> But if this happens, then we loose the connection between the packet being
> received and the process doing the reception, so the network cgroup classifier
> breaks again.
> 
> Performance gains are still a big advantage here of course.
> Neil
> 
Scratch what I said here, Herbert corrected me on this, and we're ok, as tun has
no rps map.

I'll test this patch out in just a bit
Neil

quoted text
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html