Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
quoted text
> Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com> wrote on 2010/05/07 10:53:23:
>>> 3) I would expect lost pkgs to be accounted on eth0 instead of
>>>    the VLAN interface(s) since that is where the pkg is lost, why
>>>    isn't it so?
>> You try to send packets on eth0.XXX, some are dropped, and accounted for
>> on eth0.XXX stats. What is wrong with this ?
> 
> In this case one lost pkg is accounted for twice, once on eth0.1 and
> once more on eth0.1.1. Note that eth0.1.1 is stacked on
> top of eth0.1
> 
> I would at least expect eth0 to also account lost pkgs too.
> I was confused by the current accounting as I knew that
> the underlying HW I/F should be the only I/F that could
> drop pkgs.

In case of NET_XMIT_CN, the packet is dropped by the qdisc before
it reaches eth0, so its only accounted on the upper devices.

quoted text
>> If you want to avoid this, just add queues to your vlans
>>
>> ip link add link eth0 eth0.103 txqueuelen 100 type vlan id 103
> 
>>From memory now, but that didn't help. Still accounts pgks
> as described. Why would where to account pkgs be affected by
> queue or no queue?

If a queue is used on the vlan device, it will queue the packet
until the lower device is able to transmit it (unless its own
queue overflows).
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html