Re: [PATCH 3/4] xfrm: remove policy lock when accessing policy->walk.dead

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Patrick McHardy
Date: Thursday, April 1, 2010 - 4:24 am

jamal wrote:

That's true. Since both pfkey and xfrm process messages synchronously,
there shouldn't be any need for this. In fact I couldn't even find
a single keying daemon that cares about this message.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[PATCH 0/4] xfrm fixes and flow structurization, Timo Teras, (Wed Mar 31, 3:17 am)
[PATCH 0/4] xfrm fixes and flow structurization, Timo Teras, (Wed Mar 31, 3:17 am)
[PATCH 4/4] flow: structurize flow cache, Timo Teras, (Wed Mar 31, 3:17 am)
Re: [PATCH 1/4] xfrm: increment genid before bumping state ..., =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Timo_ ..., (Wed Mar 31, 3:55 am)
Re: [PATCH 1/4] xfrm: increment genid before bumping state ..., =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Timo_ ..., (Wed Mar 31, 4:01 am)
Re: [PATCH 4/4] flow: structurize flow cache, Herbert Xu, (Wed Mar 31, 4:21 am)
Re: [PATCH 1/4] xfrm: increment genid before bumping state ..., =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Timo_ ..., (Wed Mar 31, 4:24 am)
Re: [PATCH 3/4] xfrm: remove policy lock when accessing po ..., Patrick McHardy, (Thu Apr 1, 4:24 am)
Re: [PATCH 0/4] xfrm fixes and flow structurization, David Miller, (Thu Apr 1, 7:42 pm)