Re: [PATCH v6] rps: Receive Packet Steering

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Tom Herbert
Date: Thursday, March 11, 2010 - 10:11 am

Eric, thanks for the great comments!

Yes.

Okay.

If we get rid of the double indirection like you describe below, then
this can be allocated in the same way dev->_tx is (kcalloc).  Also,
this might a a good structure for writing stats, etc.

Yes, this is much better.  The kobject documentation has dire warnings
about placing more than one kobject in a data structure, I think I
took that too literally!

Yes, i before e expect after c...

Yes.


That is an interesting idea.  I'll try it.

Yes.


I will apply it.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[PATCH v6] rps: Receive Packet Steering, Tom Herbert, (Thu Mar 11, 12:00 am)
Re: [PATCH v6] rps: Receive Packet Steering, Changli Gao, (Thu Mar 11, 2:45 am)
Re: [PATCH v6] rps: Receive Packet Steering, Eric Dumazet, (Thu Mar 11, 7:45 am)
Re: [PATCH v6] rps: Receive Packet Steering, Tom Herbert, (Thu Mar 11, 10:11 am)