Re: [net-next-2.6 PATCH 3/3] net: forbid underlaying devices to change its type

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Jay Vosburgh
Date: Wednesday, March 10, 2010 - 2:04 pm

Jiri Pirko <jpirko@redhat.com> wrote:


	Do the current initscripts / sysconfig packages do things such
that this restriction won't break things?  I.e., do those packages have
a dependency on being able to change the type after setting up, e.g., a
VLAN over bonding on Infiniband?

	This isn't to suggest that this change should be rejected if the
above is true; rather, I'm curious as to how this came up as a problem,
and whether initscripts / sysconfig require concurrent changes.

	In any event, it all seems reasonable to me, so, at least for
the bonding bits:

Signed-off-by: Jay Vosburgh <fubar@us.ibm.com>

	-J


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: [net-next-2.6 PATCH 3/3] net: forbid underlaying devic ..., Jay Vosburgh, (Wed Mar 10, 2:04 pm)
Re: [Bonding-devel] [net-next-2.6 PATCH 2/3] bonding: chec ..., Stephen Hemminger, (Wed Mar 10, 3:47 pm)