Re: [RFC]: xfrm by mark

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: jamal
Date: Monday, February 8, 2010 - 7:58 am

On Mon, 2010-02-08 at 14:30 +0100, Patrick McHardy wrote:


Good point - better safe than sorry (especially after the havoc
that ingress mark caused;->)

Would it be easier to just add a global sysctl with default being
"dont use marks"? It will be less memory use than a 32-bit mask per
mark..

cheers,
jamal

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[RFC]: xfrm by mark, jamal, (Sun Feb 7, 11:32 am)
Re: [RFC]: xfrm by mark, Patrick McHardy, (Mon Feb 8, 6:30 am)
Re: [RFC]: xfrm by mark, jamal, (Mon Feb 8, 7:58 am)
Re: [RFC]: xfrm by mark, Patrick McHardy, (Mon Feb 8, 8:00 am)
Re: [RFC]: xfrm by mark, jamal, (Mon Feb 8, 8:28 am)
Re: [RFC]: xfrm by mark, Patrick McHardy, (Mon Feb 8, 8:35 am)
Re: [RFC]: xfrm by mark, jamal, (Mon Feb 8, 8:56 am)