Re: [RFC][PATCH] ns: Syscalls for better namespace sharing control.

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Pavel Emelyanov
Date: Saturday, February 27, 2010 - 2:21 am

Eric W. Biederman wrote:

Thanks. What's the problem with setns?


Yes, I saw this from patches. Eric, I'd very much appreciate if we
workout a solution that will allow us to kill two birds with one stone.
I do not want to invent yet another bunch of system calls for "taking
weak reference".

As a "brain storm" start up. Can we use inotify/dnotify for this? 
Or maybe we should better equip the nsfd call with flags argument and 
add a flag for weak reference? In that case - how shall we get a 
notification about namespace is dead? With poll? Maybe worth making
the sys_close return only when the namespace is dead (by providing a
proper ->release callback of a file)?


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[RFC][PATCH] ns: Syscalls for better namespace sharing con ..., Eric W. Biederman, (Thu Feb 25, 1:57 pm)
Re: [RFC][PATCH] ns: Syscalls for better namespace sharing ..., Eric W. Biederman, (Thu Feb 25, 2:49 pm)
Re: [RFC][PATCH] ns: Syscalls for better namespace sharing ..., Eric W. Biederman, (Thu Feb 25, 2:54 pm)
Re: [RFC][PATCH] ns: Syscalls for better namespace sharing ..., Eric W. Biederman, (Thu Feb 25, 3:31 pm)
Re: [RFC][PATCH] ns: Syscalls for better namespace sharing ..., Eric W. Biederman, (Thu Feb 25, 5:53 pm)
Re: [RFC][PATCH] ns: Syscalls for better namespace sharing ..., Eric W. Biederman, (Thu Feb 25, 6:26 pm)
[RFC][PATCH] ns: Syscalls for better namespace sharing con ..., Eric W. Biederman, (Thu Feb 25, 8:15 pm)
Re: [RFC][PATCH] ns: Syscalls for better namespace sharing ..., Eric W. Biederman, (Fri Feb 26, 1:35 pm)
Re: [RFC][PATCH] ns: Syscalls for better namespace sharing ..., Eric W. Biederman, (Fri Feb 26, 2:24 pm)
Re: [RFC][PATCH] ns: Syscalls for better namespace sharing ..., Eric W. Biederman, (Fri Feb 26, 2:42 pm)
Re: [RFC][PATCH] ns: Syscalls for better namespace sharing ..., Eric W. Biederman, (Fri Feb 26, 2:49 pm)
Re: [RFC][PATCH] ns: Syscalls for better namespace sharing ..., Eric W. Biederman, (Fri Feb 26, 3:16 pm)
Re: [RFC][PATCH] ns: Syscalls for better namespace sharing ..., Eric W. Biederman, (Fri Feb 26, 4:13 pm)
Re: [RFC][PATCH] ns: Syscalls for better namespace sharing ..., Eric W. Biederman, (Sat Feb 27, 2:04 am)
Re: [RFC][PATCH] ns: Syscalls for better namespace sharing ..., Pavel Emelyanov, (Sat Feb 27, 2:21 am)
Re: [RFC][PATCH] ns: Syscalls for better namespace sharing ..., Eric W. Biederman, (Sat Feb 27, 2:42 am)
Re: [RFC][PATCH] ns: Syscalls for better namespace sharing ..., Eric W. Biederman, (Sat Feb 27, 12:08 pm)
Re: [RFC][PATCH] ns: Syscalls for better namespace sharing ..., Eric W. Biederman, (Sat Feb 27, 12:44 pm)
Re: [RFC][PATCH] ns: Syscalls for better namespace sharing ..., Eric W. Biederman, (Mon Mar 1, 12:24 pm)
Re: [RFC][PATCH] ns: Syscalls for better namespace sharing ..., Sukadev Bhattiprolu, (Tue Mar 2, 2:19 pm)
Re: [RFC][PATCH] ns: Syscalls for better namespace sharing ..., Sukadev Bhattiprolu, (Tue Mar 2, 5:07 pm)
Re: [RFC][PATCH] ns: Syscalls for better namespace sharing ..., Eric W. Biederman, (Wed Mar 3, 12:47 pm)
Re: [RFC][PATCH] ns: Syscalls for better namespace sharing ..., Eric W. Biederman, (Mon Mar 8, 10:29 am)
Re: [RFC][PATCH] ns: Syscalls for better namespace sharing ..., Eric W. Biederman, (Mon Mar 8, 10:35 am)