Yes, at this very moment the check is not needless but it will be in a brief
future. dev_mc_add will look very similar like dev_unicast_add. But ok. Here's
patch adding the check in dev_mc_add right now to correct this state. Thanks Or.
Subject: [net-next-2.6 PATCH] net: add addr len check to dev_mc_add
Signed-off-by: Jiri Pirko <jpirko@redhat.com>
diff --git a/net/core/dev_mcast.c b/net/core/dev_mcast.c
index 9e2fa39..fd91569 100644
--- a/net/core/dev_mcast.c
+++ b/net/core/dev_mcast.c
@@ -96,6 +96,8 @@ int dev_mc_add(struct net_device *dev, void *addr, int alen, int glbl)
int err;
netif_addr_lock_bh(dev);
+ if (alen != dev->addr_len)
+ return -EINVAL;
err = __dev_addr_add(&dev->mc_list, &dev->mc_count, addr, alen, glbl);
if (!err)
__dev_set_rx_mode(dev);
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html