Re: [PATCH 1/1] TCP: increase default initial receive window.

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: David Miller
Date: Friday, December 17, 2010 - 10:13 pm

From: Nandita Dukkipati <nanditad@google.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2010 19:20:51 -0800


That's an incredibly terse explanation for a very non-trivial
change with very non-trivial implications.

What analysis have you performed to lead you to decide that this
was a reasonable change to make?  Where can people see that
analysis and look over it to see if they agree with your
assesment of the data?

We can't apply a patch like that without any form of analysis or
reasoning.

You don't say "why" you're doing this, and frankly that really
ticks me off.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[PATCH 1/1] TCP: increase default initial receive window., Nandita Dukkipati, (Fri Dec 17, 8:20 pm)
Re: [PATCH 1/1] TCP: increase default initial receive window., Stephen Hemminger, (Fri Dec 17, 8:59 pm)
Re: [PATCH 1/1] TCP: increase default initial receive window., David Miller, (Fri Dec 17, 10:13 pm)
Re: [PATCH 1/1] TCP: increase default initial receive window., Nandita Dukkipati, (Sat Dec 18, 2:08 am)
Re: [PATCH 1/1] TCP: increase default initial receive window., Stephen Hemminger, (Mon Dec 20, 10:03 am)
[PATCH v2 1/1] TCP: increase default initial receive window., Nandita Dukkipati, (Mon Dec 20, 5:15 pm)
Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] TCP: increase default initial receive w ..., Nandita Dukkipati, (Mon Dec 20, 5:23 pm)