Re: Generalizing mmap'ed sockets

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Tom Herbert
Date: Friday, November 19, 2010 - 2:55 pm

On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 1:52 PM, David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> wrote:

And, for stream sockets the ring would be one big contiguous buffer,
for datagram would be packetized buffer like with packet interface.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Generalizing mmap'ed sockets, Tom Herbert, (Fri Nov 19, 1:04 pm)
Re: Generalizing mmap'ed sockets, Rick Jones, (Fri Nov 19, 2:32 pm)
Re: Generalizing mmap'ed sockets, David Miller, (Fri Nov 19, 2:52 pm)
Re: Generalizing mmap'ed sockets, Tom Herbert, (Fri Nov 19, 2:55 pm)
Re: Generalizing mmap'ed sockets, Rick Jones, (Fri Nov 19, 2:58 pm)
Re: Generalizing mmap'ed sockets, David Miller, (Fri Nov 19, 3:08 pm)
Re: Generalizing mmap'ed sockets, Andrew Grover, (Fri Nov 19, 3:10 pm)
Re: Generalizing mmap'ed sockets, Rick Jones, (Fri Nov 19, 3:47 pm)
Re: Generalizing mmap'ed sockets, Tom Herbert, (Fri Nov 19, 3:49 pm)
Re: Generalizing mmap'ed sockets, Michael S. Tsirkin, (Wed Nov 24, 12:57 pm)