On Fri, 2010-10-22 at 06:24 +0900, YOSHIFUJI Hideaki wrote:
IP_TRANSPARENT requires root (more precisely CAP_NET_ADMIN privielges)
for IPV6.
However as I see right now this check was missed from the IPv6
implementation.
Is that enough as a safeguard? e.g. something like this:
diff --git a/net/ipv6/ipv6_sockglue.c b/net/ipv6/ipv6_sockglue.c
index 0553867..f683d2c 100644
--- a/net/ipv6/ipv6_sockglue.c
+++ b/net/ipv6/ipv6_sockglue.c
@@ -343,6 +343,10 @@ static int do_ipv6_setsockopt(struct sock *sk, int level, int optname,
break;
case IPV6_TRANSPARENT:
+ if (!capable(CAP_NET_ADMIN)) {
+ retv = -EPERM;
+ break;
+ }
if (optlen < sizeof(int))
goto e_inval;
/* we don't have a separate transparent bit for IPV6 we use the one in the IPv4 socket */
--
Bazsi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html