Re: Linux 2.6.35/TIPC 2.0 ABI breaking changes

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Neil Horman
Date: Wednesday, October 20, 2010 - 11:04 am

On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 01:57:06PM -0400, Jon Maloy wrote:
Thats effectively reverting both our patches though, isn't it (not that I'm
disagreeing with it, just looking for clarification).  If we revert my patch and
reintroduce the htohl mechanism which tracks endianess, we might as well revert
the TIPC_SUB_SERVICE flag as well, yeah?

Neil

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: Linux 2.6.35/TIPC 2.0 ABI breaking changes, David Miller, (Tue Oct 19, 1:16 am)
Re: Linux 2.6.35/TIPC 2.0 ABI breaking changes, Neil Horman, (Wed Oct 20, 11:04 am)