Re: [PATCH net-next 0/8] tg3: Bugfixes and updates

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: David Miller
Date: Friday, October 1, 2010 - 12:26 am

From: "Matt Carlson" <mcarlson@broadcom.com>
Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2010 13:34:29 -0700


All applied....

But really, I want to hear some real justification for a 2048 entry RX
ring at gigabit speeds.  I even think 512 is way too large for gigabit
parts.

Any machine that gets one of these newer 5717 parts does not need that
much queueing, and too deep queues tend to hurt locality and thus
performance.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[PATCH net-next 0/8] tg3: Bugfixes and updates, Matt Carlson, (Thu Sep 30, 1:34 pm)
Re: [PATCH net-next 0/8] tg3: Bugfixes and updates, David Miller, (Fri Oct 1, 12:26 am)
Re: [PATCH net-next 0/8] tg3: Bugfixes and updates, Matt Carlson, (Fri Oct 1, 10:25 am)