Re: getsockopt(TCP_DEFER_ACCEPT) value change

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: David Miller
Date: Tuesday, January 5, 2010 - 1:29 pm

From: "Ilpo Järvinen" <ilpo.jarvinen@helsinki.fi>
Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2010 15:40:57 +0200 (EET)


There is no such requirement, we've been violating that premise since
day one for socket receive and send queue buffer limit socket options.

The kernel is always allowed to add fuzz or overhead adjustments to
whatever the user gives it.  If the user wants to know what the kernel
actually ended up using, it get getsockopt() to find out.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
getsockopt(TCP_DEFER_ACCEPT) value change, Daniel Lezcano, (Tue Jan 5, 3:42 am)
Re: getsockopt(TCP_DEFER_ACCEPT) value change, =?ISO-8859-15?Q?Ilpo ..., (Tue Jan 5, 6:40 am)
Re: getsockopt(TCP_DEFER_ACCEPT) value change, Eric Dumazet, (Tue Jan 5, 7:11 am)
Re: getsockopt(TCP_DEFER_ACCEPT) value change, Eric Dumazet, (Tue Jan 5, 7:45 am)
Re: getsockopt(TCP_DEFER_ACCEPT) value change, Daniel Lezcano, (Tue Jan 5, 8:45 am)
Re: getsockopt(TCP_DEFER_ACCEPT) value change, Eric Dumazet, (Tue Jan 5, 9:14 am)
Re: getsockopt(TCP_DEFER_ACCEPT) value change, Daniel Lezcano, (Tue Jan 5, 9:57 am)
Re: getsockopt(TCP_DEFER_ACCEPT) value change, David Miller, (Tue Jan 5, 1:29 pm)