Re: [PATCH] dmfe/tulip: Let dmfe handle DM910x except for SPARC on-board chips

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: David Miller
Date: Sunday, January 3, 2010 - 10:36 pm

From: Grant Grundler <grundler@parisc-linux.org>
Date: Tue, 29 Dec 2009 11:41:52 -0700


I agree, KERN_INFO is more appropriate here.

Also, for the of_get_property() calls, you don't need to pass
in a dummy "&len", just pass NULL.  This will avoid the dummy
local variable 'len'.

Make these two fixups and I'll apply this to net-2.6

Thanks!
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
dmfe/tulip device id overlap, Brandon Philips, (Tue Nov 24, 9:36 pm)
Re: dmfe/tulip device id overlap, Brandon Philips, (Tue Nov 24, 9:49 pm)
Re: dmfe/tulip device id overlap, Ben Hutchings, (Wed Nov 25, 6:08 am)
Re: dmfe/tulip device id overlap, Grant Grundler, (Wed Nov 25, 10:24 am)
Re: dmfe/tulip device id overlap, David Miller, (Sun Nov 29, 1:30 am)
Re: dmfe/tulip device id overlap, Brandon Philips, (Sun Nov 29, 11:55 pm)
Re: dmfe/tulip device id overlap, David Miller, (Mon Nov 30, 12:07 am)
Re: dmfe/tulip device id overlap, Ben Hutchings, (Mon Nov 30, 5:46 am)
Re: dmfe/tulip device id overlap, Grant Grundler, (Mon Nov 30, 10:14 am)
Re: dmfe/tulip device id overlap, David Miller, (Mon Nov 30, 1:21 pm)
Re: dmfe/tulip device id overlap, David Miller, (Mon Nov 30, 1:26 pm)
Re: dmfe/tulip device id overlap, Brandon Philips, (Mon Nov 30, 3:22 pm)
Re: dmfe/tulip device id overlap, David Miller, (Mon Nov 30, 3:29 pm)
Re: [PATCH] dmfe/tulip: Let dmfe handle DM910x except for ..., David Miller, (Sun Jan 3, 10:36 pm)