Re: igb VF allocation with quirk_i82576_sriov

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Chris Wright
Date: Tuesday, September 22, 2009 - 10:12 pm

* Alexander Duyck (alexander.h.duyck@intel.com) wrote:

VT-d was definitely there, as for the rest I'll have to ask the tester
for more details.  I just wanted to verify that it's a known working
combo before spending more time on it.

Regarding the bus numbering, I don't think there's a bus issue.
The PF+VFs all stay w/in same bus segment despite large offset and the
stride (IIRC, this was only device on bus 2, a dual port igb on .0 and .1.
the offset is 128 and stride is 2, so even w/ 8 VFs the max device would
be something like 2:11.7 or 2:12.0).


Yeah, IIRC, igbvf at least loaded on the host (on the guest too, after
unbinding host driver).  I didn't get a chance to see if VF passed
traffic on the host, and from the report, it wasn't able to get a dhcp
address in the guest.  Will dig into it a bit more after plumbers.

thanks,
-chris
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
igb VF allocation with quirk_i82576_sriov, Chris Wright, (Mon Sep 21, 10:19 pm)
Re: igb VF allocation with quirk_i82576_sriov, Alexander Duyck, (Tue Sep 22, 8:41 am)
Re: igb VF allocation with quirk_i82576_sriov, Chris Wright, (Tue Sep 22, 10:12 pm)