Re: Receive side performance issue with multi-10-GigE and NUMA

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Andrew Gallatin
Date: Friday, August 7, 2009 - 6:03 pm

Bill Fink wrote:


How were you handling IRQ binding?  If local_cpus is wrong,
the irqbalance will not be able to make good decisions about
where to bind the NICs' IRQs.  Did you try manually binding
each NICs's interrupt to a separate CPU on the correct node?

Regards,

Drew
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: Receive side performance issue with multi-10-GigE and NUMA, Andrew Gallatin, (Fri Aug 7, 6:03 pm)
Re: Receive side performance issue with multi-10-GigE and NUMA, Christoph Lameter, (Tue Aug 11, 12:15 pm)
RE: Receive side performance issue with multi-10-GigE and NUMA, Brandeburg, Jesse, (Tue Aug 11, 5:02 pm)
Re: Receive side performance issue with multi-10-GigE and NUMA, Frederic Weisbecker, (Wed Aug 26, 4:46 pm)
Re: Receive side performance issue with multi-10-GigE and NUMA, Christoph Hellwig, (Wed Aug 26, 5:34 pm)
Re: Receive side performance issue with multi-10-GigE and NUMA, Christoph Hellwig, (Wed Aug 26, 5:35 pm)