Re: Receive side performance issue with multi-10-GigE and NUMA

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Ingo Molnar
Date: Wednesday, August 26, 2009 - 4:05 pm

* David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> wrote:


It is definitely your job to ensure that you do not commit deficient 
patches to kernel/trace/ via the networking tree. You created this 
situation to begin with so you might as well take some 
responsibility and help resolve it.

And the thing is, we are not rigid about these things in the tracing 
tree and if this was a good change we would not mind and you'd have 
my Ack. The problem is that it's a crappy change and that Neil is 
refusing to fix it. So please fix it,

Thanks,

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: Receive side performance issue with multi-10-GigE and NUMA, Christoph Lameter, (Tue Aug 11, 12:15 pm)
RE: Receive side performance issue with multi-10-GigE and NUMA, Brandeburg, Jesse, (Tue Aug 11, 5:02 pm)
Re: Receive side performance issue with multi-10-GigE and NUMA, Ingo Molnar, (Wed Aug 26, 4:05 pm)
Re: Receive side performance issue with multi-10-GigE and NUMA, Frederic Weisbecker, (Wed Aug 26, 4:46 pm)
Re: Receive side performance issue with multi-10-GigE and NUMA, Christoph Hellwig, (Wed Aug 26, 5:34 pm)
Re: Receive side performance issue with multi-10-GigE and NUMA, Christoph Hellwig, (Wed Aug 26, 5:35 pm)