Hi Tomas,

quoted text
> >> add WiFi BGN SKU and WiMAX 2.4GHz SKU device ids
> >>
> >> Cc:inaky.perez-gonzalez@intel.com
> >> Cc:cindy.h.kao@intel.com
> >> Cc:yi.zhu@intel.com
> >> Signed-off-by: Tomas Winkler <tomas.winkler@intel.com>
> >
> > Since it seems we are preferring to not do this for PCI for cases
> > where the ID will only be used for 1 device perhaps its best to remove
> > all those ids and stuff them directly into the intel driver itself
> > that will use it.
> >
> I don't have strong opinion about it but this is the current habit
> IIRC there was a mail thread that explicitly asked to move SDIO IDs
> there,  of course I cannot locate it right now :(

first thing is that IDs should only be added if there are users for it.
I am missing the patches that are actually using them. Send them all
together.

Second, we have to establish what is the preferred method of IDs for the
SDIO subsystem. In general I would prefer we have a global policy for
this, but in reality it is up to the subsystem maintainers.

My personal vote is for keeping all IDs inside the drivers. And I also
prefer to keep the plain hex values and just put a comment above them
which device this is. Something like this:

static struct usb_device_id btusb_table[] = {
	/* Generic Bluetooth USB device */
	{ USB_DEVICE_INFO(0xe0, 0x01, 0x01) },

	/* AVM BlueFRITZ! USB v2.0 */
	{ USB_DEVICE(0x057c, 0x3800) },

	{ }	/* Terminating entry */
};

Regards

Marcel


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html