Re: Logic for SNAT persistent handling introduced in 2.6.30 is inverted

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Patrick McHardy
Date: Monday, August 24, 2009 - 10:28 am

Maximilian Engelhardt wrote:

Good catch, applied. I'm wondering what the people who requested and
tested this change did actually test :)


It fortunately only affects NAT to a range of IPs, which isn't
used that much.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Logic for SNAT persistent handling introduced in 2.6.30 is ..., Maximilian Engelhardt, (Mon Aug 24, 6:16 am)
Re: Logic for SNAT persistent handling introduced in 2.6.3 ..., Patrick McHardy, (Mon Aug 24, 10:28 am)