Re: [PATCH] be2net: Implementation of request_firmware interface.

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Sarveshwar Bandi <sarveshwarb@...>
Cc: <netdev@...>, <davem@...>
Date: Sunday, July 5, 2009 - 10:20 am

On Sun, 2009-07-05 at 17:46 +0530, Sarveshwar Bandi wrote:

The firmware blob is proprietary and has to be distributed separately
from the kernel.  So does it really matter that you have to distribute a
special tool as well?

(Based on requirements specified by major OEMs, I have implemented
firmware update through the sfc driver (MDIO and MTD interfaces) but
under the control of a separate tool.)

[...]

Is there a way of loading the firmware into the controller's RAM but not
writing it to flash?  That ought to be the default behaviour.

Ben.

-- 
Ben Hutchings, Senior Software Engineer, Solarflare Communications
Not speaking for my employer; that's the marketing department's job.
They asked us to note that Solarflare product names are trademarked.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: [PATCH] be2net: Implementation of request_firmware inter..., Ben Hutchings, (Sun Jul 5, 10:20 am)