Re: [PATCH] check spinlock_t/rwlock_t argument type on non-SMP builds

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: David Kilroy <kilroyd@...>, Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...>
Cc: <linux-kernel@...>, <netdev@...>
Date: Friday, July 3, 2009 - 3:38 am

* David Kilroy wrote:

> When writing code for UP without CONFIG_DEBUG_SPINLOCK it's easy

Wondering - can the wrappers be moved from CPP land to C land by
turning them into inlines? (i havent checked all usages so there
might be some surprises, but by and large it ought to be possible.)

Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: [PATCH] check spinlock_t/rwlock_t argument type on non-S..., Ingo Molnar, (Fri Jul 3, 3:38 am)