JD> Why? It seems that this would cause checkpoints to fail JD> unexpectedly, Well, there are other places where the checkpoint will fail with EBUSY because something is in a transitional state. JD> and is probably unnecessary in a migration scenario, because the JD> peer will retransmit the segments given appropriate ACKs. Cool, sounds like we can punt on this particular one... Thanks :) -- Dan Smith IBM Linux Technology Center email: danms@us.ibm.com -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
