On Tue, 23 Jun 2009 20:52:02 +0200 Krzysztof Halasa wrote:Me2 :) That may be a flaw in some parts of this doc is that it tries to get too detailed, too rigid, etc. for a process that is more fluid and has lots of independent parts each working in its own slightly different way. It does seem like there is value in much of what's here, but there just aren't any black-and-white rules for exactly how patches are handled. jake -- Jake Edge - LWN - jake@lwn.net - http://lwn.net -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
| James Bottomley | Re: Integration of SCST in the mainstream Linux kernel |
| Greg Kroah-Hartman | [PATCH 007/196] Chinese: add translation of stable_kernel_rules.txt |
| david | Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3 |
| Jan Engelhardt | intel iommu (Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23) |
git: | |
| Alexey Dobriyan | Re: [GIT]: Networking |
| Jarek Poplawski | [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 27/37] dccp: Integration of dynamic feature activation - part 2 (server side) |
| David Miller | Re: [BUG] New Kernel Bugs |
