Re: via velocity trivial patch

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: David Miller
Date: Thursday, May 7, 2009 - 3:02 pm

From: Radek Podgorny <radek@podgorny.cz>
Date: Wed, 06 May 2009 23:07:02 +0200


"some garbage"...

Why would the interrupt status register give us all 1's
if it is properly initialized?  I should report a zero,
rather than "some garbage".

You also failed to provide a proper sign-off as described
in Documentation/SubmittingPatches
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
via velocity trivial patch, Radek Podgorny, (Wed May 6, 2:07 pm)
Re: via velocity trivial patch, David Miller, (Thu May 7, 3:02 pm)
Re: via velocity trivial patch, Radek Podgorny, (Fri May 8, 4:32 am)
Re: via velocity trivial patch, Francois Romieu, (Fri May 8, 12:29 pm)
Re: via velocity trivial patch, David Miller, (Fri May 8, 12:40 pm)
Re: via velocity trivial patch, David Miller, (Fri May 8, 12:41 pm)
Re: via velocity trivial patch, Radek Podgorny, (Sun May 10, 2:06 pm)
Re: via velocity trivial patch, Radek Podgorny, (Wed May 13, 6:03 am)
Re: via velocity trivial patch, Francois Romieu, (Wed May 13, 3:32 pm)