Re: [PATCH] ieee1394: eth1394: use "firewire%d" instead of "eth%d" as interface name

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: David Miller
Date: Thursday, May 21, 2009 - 12:34 pm

From: Stefan Richter <stefanr@s5r6.in-berlin.de>
Date: Thu, 21 May 2009 15:29:10 +0200 (CEST)


I think the basis for this patch is completely bogus.

Device names are just that, names.  If you want to know "what it is"
or "where it is" you use tools to determine that information.

If you make ethtool's get info command return something useful,
then the user can see that it's a firewire interface and act
accordingly, as can sophisticated confiruation applications.

I am completely against this patch.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: [PATCH] ieee1394: eth1394: use "firewire%d" instead of ..., David Miller, (Thu May 21, 12:34 pm)