On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 11:39:02AM +0100, Antonio Almeida wrote:
quoted text
> Hi!
> 
> Here the information you asked:

Very nice, but there are some questions:
- if this analyser uses tcp we definitely need tso off as well during
  these tests,
- it would be nice to use two patches I've sent to exclude known (now)
  reasons.

With the above I expect accuracy should be better, but definitely not
like hfsc (plus no higher than 1000Mbit rate reported after stopping
effect).

Thanks,
Jarek P.

quoted text
> 
> # ethtool -k eth0
> Offload parameters for eth0:
> rx-checksumming: on
> tx-checksumming: on
> scatter-gather: on
> tcp segmentation offload: on
> udp fragmentation offload: off
> generic segmentation offload: off
> 
> # ethtool -k eth1
> Offload parameters for eth1:
> rx-checksumming: on
> tx-checksumming: on
> scatter-gather: on
> tcp segmentation offload: on
> udp fragmentation offload: off
> generic segmentation offload: off
> 
> The bridge is between eth0 and eth1
...
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html