On Monday 11 May 2009, Ilpo Järvinen wrote:Hmm. I wonder if it wouldn't be better to keep the two issues separate. The initial patch is a clear regression fix (4 people have reported it against fetchmail for Debian). The URG part is IMO a separate issue which I at least have never seen in practice. And my Tested-by doesn't cover the additional change either. That said, I have added the URG change (as an incremental patch) in my local git repo and will give it a go when I next build a kernel (may take a week). I don't expect to be able to confirm it fixes the URG race, but I can at least check that it doesn't cause any false messages with my (spectacularly unspectacular) network traffic. I'll report the result. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
| Cliffe | Re: [RFC 0/5] [TALPA] Intro to a linux interface for on access scanning |
| Amit K. Arora | [RFC] Heads up on sys_fallocate() |
| Bart Van Assche | Integration of SCST in the mainstream Linux kernel |
| Andrew Morton | Re: [RFC/PATCH] Documentation of kernel messages |
| David Miller | [GIT]: Networking |
| Jarek Poplawski | Re: [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
| Radu Rendec | Endianness problem with u32 classifier hash masks |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 27/37] dccp: Integration of dynamic feature activation - part 2 (server side) |
git: | |
