| From | Subject | Date |
|---|---|---|
| Stephen Hemminger | Re: What makes a good fake MAC address?
On Wed, 22 Apr 2009 15:15:05 -0700
You need a from address for the bridge to be able to populate its
forwarding table. If remote end is always same, just get some random
address at start of tunnel and reuse it.
--
| Apr 22, 3:25 pm 2009 |
| Inaky Perez-Gonzalez | Re: What makes a good fake MAC address?
heh :) I'll give a try to just try an address from random_ether_addr(),
it might work
Thanks!
--
Inaky
--
| Apr 22, 4:35 pm 2009 |
| Mark Smith | What makes a good fake MAC address?
Hi Inaky,
(please CC me, I'm not on the list)
"The problem with using a zero mac address is that it confuses the
bridging software (and maybe others). I was wondering, what would be a
fake mac address we could put in there that is legal for this kind of
"faking"? [or the closest thing to legal?]"
Since you're from an organisation with an OUI allocation or two, I
think a real Intel one would be best. It then wouldn't be fake, and no
matter where it was exposed (host only, local network, or ...
| Apr 22, 2:34 pm 2009 |
| Inaky Perez-Gonzalez | Re: What makes a good fake MAC address?
It doesn't really work, because it is for the "from" end of the connection; as
said somewhere else in the thread, the WiMAX link is P2P, IP only. The card
has a local address, that we use for the "to" field, but for the from, we
need to fake an address from the network -- which is not necessarily an intel
device :)
So maybe local addresses would not be the right choice, and clearly Intel
assigned ones neither :)
Thanks,
--
Inaky
--
| Apr 22, 3:15 pm 2009 |
| Inaky Perez-Gonzalez | Re: What makes a good fake MAC address?
Nope, the remote end will change as you move around from base station to base
station :(
--
Inaky
--
| Apr 22, 3:38 pm 2009 |
| Stephen Hemminger | Re: What makes a good fake MAC address?
On Wed, 22 Apr 2009 15:38:10 -0700
Then don't bridge.
--
| Apr 22, 3:59 pm 2009 |
| Ben Greear | ath5k irq warning message
I'm working on debugging some sort of live-lock related to irqs
in ath5k with lots of virtual stations.
I notice this code in the ath5k_intr method.
Won't counter be -1 if you break out of this due to the 'counter-- > 0'
clause?
If so, then that warning won't be printed regardless...
} while (ath5k_hw_is_intr_pending(ah) && counter-- > 0);
if (unlikely(!counter))
ATH5K_WARN(sc, "too many interrupts, giving up for now\n");
Thanks,
Ben
--
Ben Greear ...
| Apr 22, 2:56 pm 2009 |
| Kumar Gala | [PATCH v2] fs_enet: Remove dead code
CONFIG_DUET doesn't exist anymore, remove all the code that exists to
support it.
Signed-off-by: Kumar Gala <galak@kernel.crashing.org>
---
* Removed stale comment that went along w/DUET support
drivers/net/fs_enet/fs_enet-main.c | 35 +----------------------------------
drivers/net/fs_enet/fs_enet.h | 5 -----
drivers/net/fs_enet/mac-fec.c | 34 ----------------------------------
3 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 73 deletions(-)
diff --git ...
| Apr 22, 2:35 pm 2009 |
| Kumar Gala | [PATCH] fs_enet: Remove dead code
CONFIG_DUET doesn't exist anymore, remove all the code that exists to
support it.
Signed-off-by: Kumar Gala <galak@kernel.crashing.org>
---
drivers/net/fs_enet/fs_enet-main.c | 35 +----------------------------------
drivers/net/fs_enet/fs_enet.h | 5 -----
drivers/net/fs_enet/mac-fec.c | 30 ------------------------------
3 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 69 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/fs_enet/fs_enet-main.c b/drivers/net/fs_enet/fs_enet-main.c
index ...
| Apr 22, 2:19 pm 2009 |
| Scott Wood | Re: [PATCH] fs_enet: Remove dead code
Please remove the comment that goes with the code being removed.
Otherwise, ACK.
-Scott
--
| Apr 22, 2:30 pm 2009 |
| Eric Dumazet | Re: What makes a good fake MAC address?
We have random_ether_addr(), it should be self explained :)
/**
* random_ether_addr - Generate software assigned random Ethernet address
* @addr: Pointer to a six-byte array containing the Ethernet address
*
* Generate a random Ethernet address (MAC) that is not multicast
* and has the local assigned bit set.
*/
static inline void random_ether_addr(u8 *addr)
{
get_random_bytes (addr, ETH_ALEN);
addr [0] &= 0xfe; /* clear multicast bit */
addr [0] |= ...
| Apr 22, 2:13 pm 2009 |
| Stephen Hemminger | Re: What makes a good fake MAC address?
On Wed, 22 Apr 2009 13:48:27 -0700
You want really want hw to have real mac, but if not use
random_ether_addr()
--
| Apr 22, 2:13 pm 2009 |
| Inaky Perez-Gonzalez | Re: What makes a good fake MAC address?
(Also in reply to Stephen's comment) the device has its own local address;
what we are faking is the address the packet comes from.
According to random_ether_addr(), it sets the local bits; will this work to
fake the "other end of the connection"? (for which there is an IP address but
no MAC address, it being a pure IP link).
Thanks,
--
Inaky
--
| Apr 22, 2:28 pm 2009 |
| Inaky Perez-Gonzalez | What makes a good fake MAC address?
Hi All
The Intel i2400m WiMAX driver behaves as an ethernet device, and currently
when sending packets to the netdev stack, it fakes an ethernet header, sets
the "from" mac address to zeroes and the "to" to it's own MAC address.
The WiMAX network can be considered to be a point-to-point (up to the gateway)
connection, all IP based, so there are not MAC addresses from our gateway
(not to mention that it can change behind us).
The problem with using a zero mac address is that it ...
| Apr 22, 1:48 pm 2009 |
| Christoph Lameter | Re: udp ping pong measurements from 2.6.22 to .30 with v ...
Hmmm.... It does not since it depends on the way that the machine is
Latencies have priority here. Multi-flows are secondary.
So I guess this means that you are okay with the network stacks latency
creep? Even if its only 1.5usec: In practice you tune the NIC to perform
much better and this is a latency increase likely occurring in every
packet transmission.
--
| Apr 22, 2:09 pm 2009 |
| Christoph Lameter | udp ping pong measurements from 2.6.22 to .30 with vario ...
Here are the results of udp ping pong tests. Tests were done with between
two machines. The first box was running a 2.6.22 kernel with the nic IRQ
and udpping pinned to processor 4.
The second box ran the various kernel versions. NIC irq pinned to cpu 4.
Then the pinning of udpping (see gentwo.org/ll) was varied
1. Pinned to the same processor (cpu4)
2. Pinned to a processor that shares the L2 cache (cpu5)
3. Pinned to a processor not sharing L2 (cpu6)
Results follow (a nice diagram is ...
| Apr 22, 1:16 pm 2009 |
| Eric Dumazet | Re: udp ping pong measurements from 2.6.22 to .30 with v ...
Here on my dev machine, cpu0, cpu2, cpu4, cpu6 are on physical CPU 0
and cpu1, cpu3, cpu5, cpu7 on physical CPU 1
egrep "processor|core id|physical" /proc/cpuinfo
processor : 0
physical id : 0
core id : 0
processor : 1
physical id : 1
core id : 0
processor : 2
physical id : 0
core id : 2
processor : 3
physical id : 1
core id : 2
processor : 4
physical id : 0
core id : 1
processor ...
| Apr 22, 2:02 pm 2009 |
| Thadeu Lima de Souza ... | e100 shutdown breaks e100 probing when using kexec
Hello, folks.
As seen recently, I've sent a bugfix for the e100 shutdown in the same
lines as the patches proposed by RWJ to e1000, e1000e and some other
network devices.
I would like to get some light about the need to disable wake when
suspending if there is no WOL support, if most, if not all, resume and
probe code already do it. If it is really needed, perhaps, an utility
helper function could be written and most drivers migrated to it.
But another issue is that, in some particular ...
| Apr 22, 11:32 am 2009 |
| Rafael J. Wysocki | Re: e100 shutdown breaks e100 probing when using kexec
If I understand the problem correctly, e100 sometimes doesn't proble
successfully after kexec if it was put into D3 before. If that's really the
case, I don't think it's related to wake-up at all. The very same issue has
been obseverd for some other devices and I don't think we know the root cause
of it. Still, the solution seems to be not to put devices into D3 on shutdown
This may be unrelated to the probing of PCI devices or at least not directly
related to it. There may be something ...
| Apr 22, 12:55 pm 2009 |
| Karsten Keil | [PATCH 0/3] [ISDN] Documentation patchset
Add some useful documentation for the ISDN subsystem.
Orignal patches are from Tilman Schmidt.
I fixed some whitespace issues and added the URL for the CAPI 2.0 spec.
Karsten Keil (1):
Add reference to CAPI 2.0 standard
Tilman Schmidt (2):
update Documentation/isdn/00-INDEX
Documentation/isdn/INTERFACE.CAPI
Documentation/isdn/00-INDEX | 17 +++-
Documentation/isdn/INTERFACE.CAPI | 208 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
drivers/isdn/capi/kcapi.c | 171 ...
| Apr 22, 7:31 am 2009 |
| Tilman Schmidt | [PATCH 1/3] update Documentation/isdn/00-INDEX
Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 17:51:32 +0200
After the merging of mISDN, state which files refer only to the
old isdn4linux subsystem. Also add a few missing files.
Signed-off-by: Tilman Schmidt <tilman@imap.cc>
Signed-off-by: Karsten Keil <keil@b1-systems.de>
---
Documentation/isdn/00-INDEX | 15 +++++++++++----
1 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/isdn/00-INDEX b/Documentation/isdn/00-INDEX
index 9fee5f2..d9660ee 100644
--- ...
| Apr 22, 7:31 am 2009 |
| Tilman Schmidt | [PATCH 2/3] Documentation/isdn/INTERFACE.CAPI
Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 11:18:52 +0200
isdn: document Kernel CAPI driver interface
Create a file Documentation/isdn/INTERFACE.CAPI describing the
interface between the kernel CAPI subsystem and ISDN device drivers,
analogous to the existing Documentation/isdn/INTERFACE for the old
isdn4linux subsystem. Also add kerneldoc comments to the exported
functions in drivers/isdn/capi/kcapi.c.
Impact: Documentation
Signed-off-by: Tilman Schmidt <tilman@imap.cc>
Signed-off-by: Karsten Keil ...
| Apr 22, 7:31 am 2009 |
| Karsten Keil | [PATCH 3/3] Add reference to CAPI 2.0 standard
Move the entry about CAPI 2.0 to the beginning and add a URL.
Incorporate changes suggested by Randy Dunlap, thanks for proofreading.
Signed-off-by: Karsten Keil <keil@b1-systems.de>
---
Documentation/isdn/INTERFACE.CAPI | 20 +++++++++++++-------
1 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/isdn/INTERFACE.CAPI b/Documentation/isdn/INTERFACE.CAPI
index 8947ffc..4d802ee 100644
--- a/Documentation/isdn/INTERFACE.CAPI
+++ ...
| Apr 22, 7:31 am 2009 |
| Andreas Mohr | Re: [BUILD FAILURE 02/12] Next April 21 : PPC64 randconf ...
Hi,
But NI65 is properly guarded against ISA bus non-support already:
config NI65
tristate "NI6510 support"
depends on NET_VENDOR_RACAL && ISA && ISA_DMA_API
help
If you have a network (Ethernet) card of this type, say Y and read
the Ethernet-HOWTO, available from
<http://www.tldp.org/docs.html#howto>.
To compile this driver as a module, choose M here. The module
will be called ni65.
And powerpc _does_ offer ISA ...
| Apr 22, 10:20 am 2009 |
| Subrata Modak | Re: [BUILD FAILURE 02/12] Next April 21 : PPC64 randconf ...
> drivers/net/ni65.c: In function
| Apr 22, 9:15 am 2009 |
| Y. D. | IMQ bug: kernel reboot immediately
Hi,
Is IMQ still maintained? I am using IMQ to shape ingress traffic.
But the application is a streaming server (VLC). However, the kernel
reboots immediately as quick as can hardly been seen what is
wrong with it.
Any help with this kinda problem?
Thanks,
Shawn
--------------
Y. D.
2009-04-22
--
| Apr 22, 8:27 am 2009 |
| Magnus Damm | [PATCH] smsc911x: add fifo byteswap support
From: Magnus Damm <damm@igel.co.jp>
This patch adds fifo byteswap support to the smsc911x driver.
The smsc911x hardware supports both big and little and endian
hardware configurations, and the linux smsc911x driver currently
detects word order.
For correct operation on big endian platforms lacking swapped
byte lanes the following patch is needed. Only fifo data is
swapped, register data does not require any swapping.
Signed-off-by: Magnus Damm <damm@igel.co.jp>
---
Platform data ...
| Apr 22, 7:55 am 2009 |
| Steve.Glendinning | Re: [PATCH] smsc911x: add fifo byteswap support
I guess this is to work around a problem with hardware that's
already in production?
The best solution would be to swap the byte lanes in hardware,
as the device's endian swapping features only affect registers
(not the FIFOs). The very latest devices in this family
(such as the LAN9221) can swap both independently, but this
driver has to also support older parts.
Performance will be suboptimal with this software byteswapping,
so I think we should also add a comment to stress that this ...
| Apr 22, 8:21 am 2009 |
| Eilon Greenstein | [PATCH 4/4] bnx2x: driver version 1.48.105-1
Signed-off-by: Vladislav Zolotarov <vladz@broadcom.com>
Signed-off-by: Eilon Greenstein <eilong@broadcom.com>
---
drivers/net/bnx2x_main.c | 4 ++--
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/bnx2x_main.c b/drivers/net/bnx2x_main.c
index 0ed1ced..d976dd4 100644
--- a/drivers/net/bnx2x_main.c
+++ b/drivers/net/bnx2x_main.c
@@ -56,8 +56,8 @@
#include "bnx2x_init_ops.h"
#include "bnx2x_dump.h"
-#define DRV_MODULE_VERSION "1.48.105"
-#define ...
| Apr 22, 6:40 am 2009 |
| Eilon Greenstein | [PATCH 2/4] bnx2x: Separated FW from the source.
>From now on FW will be downloaded from the binary file using request_firmware.
There will be different files for every supported chip. Currently 57710 (e1) and
57711 (e1h).
File names have the following format: bnx2x-<chip version>-<FW version>.fw.
ihex versions of current FW files are submitted in the next patch.
Each binary file has a header in the following format:
struct bnx2x_fw_file_section {
__be32 len;
__be32 offset;
}
struct bnx2x_fw_file_hdr {
struct ...
| Apr 22, 6:40 am 2009 |
| Eilon Greenstein | [PATCH 0/4] bnx2x: Use request_firmware()
Hi,
This patch is based on the original idea of John Wright
<john.wright@hp.com>.
It separates FW blob from the sources. Driver will use request_firmware
interface instead.
It includes 4 patches:
1 - inserting the ihex FW (too big for the mailing list, but not
intersting)
2 - the actual patch
3 - removing the old FW BLOB (also too big - but just removal)
4 - version update
The patches were made by Vlad - Thanks Vlad!
Dave - please consider applying for ...
| Apr 22, 6:38 am 2009 |
| © | **JACKPOT**JOY WINNER**
You have won £750,000 GBP.
contact with your name, age, country and address to,
Dr Joseph Patrick Email agenttoffices@gmail.com
--
| Apr 22, 5:19 am 2009 |
| Ursula Braun | Re: [patch 0/8] iucv / af_iucv patches for net-next-2.6.30-rc1
Dave,
the af_iucv-patches sent today apply to net-next-2.6 without pulling
yesterday's patches for net-2.6.
If you prefer to pull net-2.6 first (in order to avoid potential future
merge conflicts), I can rebuild and resend today's net-next-2.6 patches
based on yesterday's af_iucv patches for net-2.6.
Regards, Ursula Braun
--
| Apr 22, 4:39 am 2009 |
| David Miller | [GIT]: Networking
1) The usual assortment of several small wired driver fixes.
CXGB3 link fault, workqueue lockup, MSI-X leak, EEH fixes from Divy Le Ray
MACB retry limit and interrupt status loss fixes from Eric Waling
UCC_GETH RMII PHY mode fix from Heiko Schocher
TG3 final fix for the endian-corrupted MAC issue from Matt Carlson.
IXGBE chip settings fix for 82599 from P. J. Waskiewicz.
"(!x & y)" --> "(!(x & y))" fix in IXGBE from Tony Breeds
TX queue restart fix in e1000e from Jesse ...
| Apr 22, 3:48 am 2009 |
| Sachin Sant | April 22 Next : net/rfkill randconfig failure
Today's next tree build (x86 randconfig) failed with
net/rfkill/rfkill.c: In function 'update_rfkill_state':
net/rfkill/rfkill.c:99: error: implicit declaration of function 'rfkill_led_trigger'
make[2]: *** [net/rfkill/rfkill.o] Error 1
.config attached
Thanks
-Sachin
--
---------------------------------
Sachin Sant
IBM Linux Technology Center
India Systems and Technology Labs
Bangalore, India
---------------------------------
| Apr 22, 3:38 am 2009 |
| Ursula Braun | [patch 6/8] [PATCH] af_iucv: Provide new socket type SOC ...
From: Hendrik Brueckner <brueckner@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
This patch provides the socket type SOCK_SEQPACKET in addition to
SOCK_STREAM.
AF_IUCV sockets of type SOCK_SEQPACKET supports an 1:1 mapping of
socket read or write operations to complete IUCV messages.
Socket data or IUCV message data is not fragmented as this is the
case for SOCK_STREAM sockets.
The intention is to help application developers who write
applications or device drivers using native IUCV interfaces
(Linux kernel or ...
| Apr 22, 2:26 am 2009 |
| David Miller | Re: [patch 0/8] iucv / af_iucv patches for net-next-2.6.30-rc1
From: Ursula Braun <ursula.braun@de.ibm.com>
Do I need to pull net-2.6 into net-next-2.6 for this stuff
to apply properly?
Just checking.
--
| Apr 22, 2:48 am 2009 |
| Ursula Braun | [patch 0/8] iucv / af_iucv patches for net-next-2.6.30-rc1
Dave,
thanks for applying our critical af_iucv bug fixes to net-2.6.
Here is now the series of iucv / af_iucv patches for the current
development cycle.
The patches are based on top of the current net-next-2.6 kernel
(2.6.30-rc1).
Hendrik Brueckner (7)
af_iucv: sync sk shutdown flag if iucv path is quiesced
af_iucv: add sockopt() to enable/disable use of IPRM_DATA msgs
af_iucv: Support data in IUCV msg parameter lists (IPRMDATA)
af_iucv: Modify iucv msg target class using ...
| Apr 22, 2:26 am 2009 |
| Ursula Braun | [patch 4/8] [PATCH] af_iucv: Support data in IUCV msg pa ...
From: Hendrik Brueckner <brueckner@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
The patch allows to send and receive data in the parameter list of an
iucv message.
The parameter list is an arry of 8 bytes that are used by af_iucv as
follows:
0..6 7 bytes for socket data and
7 1 byte to store the data length.
Instead of storing the data length directly, the difference
between 0xFF and the data length is used.
This convention does not interfere with the existing use of PRM
messages for shutting down the send ...
| Apr 22, 2:26 am 2009 |
| Ursula Braun | [patch 3/8] [PATCH] af_iucv: add sockopt() to enable/dis ...
From: Hendrik Brueckner <brueckner@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Provide the socket operations getsocktopt() and setsockopt() to enable/disable
sending of data in the parameter list of IUCV messages.
The patch sets respective flag only.
Signed-off-by: Hendrik Brueckner <brueckner@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Ursula Braun <ursula.braun@de.ibm.com>
---
include/linux/socket.h | 1
include/net/iucv/af_iucv.h | 4 ++
net/iucv/af_iucv.c | 79 ...
| Apr 22, 2:26 am 2009 |
| Ursula Braun | [patch 5/8] [PATCH] af_iucv: Modify iucv msg target clas ...
From: Hendrik Brueckner <brueckner@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Allow 'classification' of socket data that is sent or received over
an af_iucv socket. For classification of data, the target class of an
(native) iucv message is used.
This patch provides the cmsg interface for iucv_sock_recvmsg() and
iucv_sock_sendmsg(). Applications can use the msg_control field of
struct msghdr to set or get the target class as a
"socket control message" (SCM/CMSG).
Signed-off-by: Hendrik Brueckner ...
| Apr 22, 2:26 am 2009 |
| Ursula Braun | [patch 8/8] [PATCH] af_iucv: New socket option for setti ...
From: Hendrik Brueckner <brueckner@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
The SO_MSGLIMIT socket option modifies the message limit for new
IUCV communication paths.
The message limit specifies the maximum number of outstanding messages
that are allowed for connections. This setting can be lowered by z/VM
when an IUCV connection is established.
Expects an integer value in the range of 1 to 65535.
The default value is 65535.
The message limit must be set before calling connect() or listen()
for ...
| Apr 22, 2:26 am 2009 |
| Ursula Braun | [patch 7/8] [PATCH] af_iucv: cleanup and refactor recvms ...
From: Hendrik Brueckner <brueckner@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
If the skb cannot be copied to user iovec, always return -EFAULT.
The skb is enqueued again, except MSG_PEEK flag is set, to allow user space
applications to correct its iovec pointer.
Signed-off-by: Hendrik Brueckner <brueckner@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Ursula Braun <ursula.braun@de.ibm.com>
---
net/iucv/af_iucv.c | 10 +++-------
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
Index: ...
| Apr 22, 2:26 am 2009 |
| Ursula Braun | [patch 1/8] [PATCH] iucv: provide second per-cpu IUCV co ...
From: Ursula Braun <ursula.braun@de.ibm.com>
Some of the IUCV commands can be invoked in interrupt context.
Those commands need a different per-cpu IUCV command parameter block,
otherwise they might overwrite an IUCV command parameter of a not yet
finished IUCV command invocation in process context.
Signed-off-by: Ursula Braun <ursula.braun@de.ibm.com>
---
net/iucv/iucv.c | 41 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
1 file changed, 31 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff -urpN ...
| Apr 22, 2:26 am 2009 |
| Ursula Braun | [patch 2/8] [PATCH] af_iucv: sync sk shutdown flag if iu ...
From: Hendrik Brueckner <brueckner@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
If the af_iucv communication partner quiesces the path to shutdown its
receive direction, provide a quiesce callback implementation to shutdown
the (local) send direction. This ensures that both sides are synchronized.
Signed-off-by: Hendrik Brueckner <brueckner@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Ursula Braun <ursula.braun@de.ibm.com>
---
net/iucv/af_iucv.c | 19 ++++++++++++++++++-
1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 1 ...
| Apr 22, 2:26 am 2009 |
| Gilles Chanteperdrix | Re: [PATCH 1/2] Add an alternative cs89x0 driver
The 2d3d.co.za domain does not seem to exist.
--
Gilles.
--
| Apr 22, 2:42 am 2009 |
| Sascha Hauer | [PATCH 2/2] mx1ads: Add cs89x0 network support
Signed-off-by: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>
---
arch/arm/mach-mx1/mx1ads.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++
1 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-mx1/mx1ads.c b/arch/arm/mach-mx1/mx1ads.c
index e54057f..6d23fcc 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-mx1/mx1ads.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-mx1/mx1ads.c
@@ -155,6 +155,24 @@ static struct i2c_board_info mx1ads_i2c_devices[] = {
},
};
+static struct resource cs89x0_resources[] = {
+ {
+ .start = IMX_CS4_PHYS ...
| Apr 22, 12:59 am 2009 |
| Sascha Hauer | [PATCH] Add new cs89x0 driver
While this is a very old chip it is still in use on some embedded boards.
I see myself unable to fix the in Kernel driver to bring it to driver
model support, so this patch adds a new driver designed to replace
the old one, at least for non-ISA hardware.
Sascha
--
| Apr 22, 12:59 am 2009 |
| Sascha Hauer | [PATCH 1/2] Add an alternative cs89x0 driver
The in Kernel driver is far beyond its age. it still does not use
driver model and its mere presence in the Kernel image prevents
booting my board. The CS8900 still is in use on some embedded
boards, so this patch adds an alternative driver to the tree
designed to replace the old one.
Signed-off-by: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>
---
drivers/net/Kconfig | 12 +
drivers/net/Makefile | 1 +
drivers/net/cirrus-cs89x0.c | 847 ...
| Apr 22, 12:59 am 2009 |
| Ivo Clarysse | Re: [PATCH 1/2] Add an alternative cs89x0 driver
These REV_B / REV_C / REV_D defines are not used, and in fact depend
This will report incorrectly for CS8900 (not CS8900A), and for CS8900A rev. F:
According to the CS8900A and CS8920A datasheets, the product ID should
be interpreted as:
0x0700 CS8900A rev. B
0x0800 CS8900A rev. C
0x0900 CS8900A rev. D
0x0A00 CS8900A rev. F
0x6100 CS8920 rev. B
0x6200 CS8920 rev. C
0x6300 CS8920 rev. D
0x6400 CS8920A rev. A/B
0x6500 CS8920A rev. C
(I couldn't find the datasheet for the ...
| Apr 22, 2:28 am 2009 |
| Gilles Chanteperdrix | Re: [PATCH 1/2] Add an alternative cs89x0 driver
| Apr 22, 5:25 am 2009 |
| Sascha Hauer | Re: [PATCH 1/2] Add an alternative cs89x0 driver
I'll set him on cc in the next round. I changed the module author
nonetheless as it's better when mails regarding this driver go to
me instead of Abraham (who wrote this driver in 2.4 days and probably
has not much interest in it anymore)
Sascha
--
Pengutronix e.K. | |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 |
Amtsgericht ...
| Apr 22, 6:05 am 2009 |
| Lennert Buytenhek | Re: [PATCH] Add new cs89x0 driver
I had the same thought initially when I started working on mv643xx_eth,
but I decided to try and beat the existing driver into shape anyway. The
mv643xx_eth driver now is not too different from how I would have written
it had I rewritten it from scratch, and refactoring it took about a
hundred commits and probably a bunch more effort than just rewriting it
would have taken, but in the end I probably _saved_ myself time by being
able to (have users) bisect problems instead of having to spend ...
| Apr 22, 3:53 pm 2009 |
| Sascha Hauer | Re: [PATCH 1/2] Add an alternative cs89x0 driver
Ok, I'll just put myself as the module author and leave the credits to
Abraham in the header, just removing his email address. I can't find
any newer pointers to Abraham besides a facebook profile.
Sascha
--
Pengutronix e.K. | |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: ...
| Apr 22, 5:20 am 2009 |
| Sascha Hauer | Re: [PATCH 1/2] Add an alternative cs89x0 driver
Ok, will fix.
Sascha
--
Pengutronix e.K. | |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
--
| Apr 22, 5:18 am 2009 |
| David Miller | Re: [net-next-2.6 PATCH] e1000/e1000e/igb/ixgb: do not u ...
From: Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com>
Applied to net-next-2.6, thanks.
--
| Apr 22, 12:48 am 2009 |
| Jeff Kirsher | [net-next-2.6 PATCH] e1000/e1000e/igb/ixgb: do not use n ...
From: Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@intel.com>
It was pointed out that the Intel wired ethernet drivers do not need to
wake the tx queue since netif_carrier_on/off will take care of the qdisc
management in order to guarantee the correct handling of the transmit
routine enable state.
Signed-off-by: Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com>
---
drivers/net/e1000/e1000_main.c | 4 ++--
drivers/net/e1000e/netdev.c | ...
| Apr 21, 9:42 pm 2009 |
| David Miller | Re: pull request: wireless-2.6 2008-04-21
From: "John W. Linville" <linville@tuxdriver.com>
Pulled, thanks John.
--
| Apr 21, 5:17 pm 2009 |
| David Miller | Re: [PATCH] netlabel: Always remove the correct address ...
From: Etienne Basset <etienne.basset@numericable.fr>
Applied, thanks everyone.
--
| Apr 22, 12:46 am 2009 |
| Etienne Basset | Re: [PATCH] netlabel: Always remove the correct address ...
Hi,
thanks Paul!
--
| Apr 21, 10:55 pm 2009 |
| David Miller | Re: [PATCH] snmp: add missing counters for RFC 4293
From: Eric Dumazet <dada1@cosmosbay.com>
It is my understanding that after Mitsuru's patch, all RFC4293
values are available in one way or another.
--
| Apr 22, 2:08 am 2009 |
| Eric Dumazet | Re: [PATCH] snmp: add missing counters for RFC 4293
Well, looking now at the patch again, I think you cannot add new fields
without breaking existing apps. My previous review stoped at this _BH thing
wihthout looking further :)
Also, it seems some RFC4293 items are already handled, since commit d831666e
from Mitsuru Chinen. Check net/ipv4/proc.c, line 114
/* Following RFC4293 items are displayed in /proc/net/netstat */
static const struct snmp_mib snmp4_ipextstats_list[] = {
SNMP_MIB_ITEM("InNoRoutes", IPSTATS_MIB_INNOROUTES),
...
| Apr 21, 10:15 pm 2009 |
| David Miller | Re: [PATCH] snmp: add missing counters for RFC 4293
From: Eric Dumazet <dada1@cosmosbay.com>
Fair enough. Neil I wait for an updated patch :-)
--
| Apr 22, 2:50 am 2009 |
| Neil Horman | Re: [PATCH] snmp: add missing counters for RFC 4293
I suppose, I'm just trying to avoid collecting data for stats that the snmp
Yeah, that makes sense, and I like the way it looks a bit better. I'll update
the patch later this evening
Thanks!
--
| Apr 22, 11:44 am 2009 |
| Eric Dumazet | Re: [PATCH] snmp: add missing counters for RFC 4293
You are welcome.
--
| Apr 21, 10:17 pm 2009 |
| Eric Dumazet | Re: [PATCH] snmp: add missing counters for RFC 4293
Yes, I found it on page 7, on diagram.
OutBcastPkts (1)
Legend (1) is : (1) The HC counters and octet counters are also found at these points
but have been left out for clarity.
So apparently RFC forgot OutBcastOctets/InBcastOctets somewhere, oh well...
We actually have
IpExt: InNoRoutes InTruncatedPkts InMcastPkts OutMcastPkts InBcastPkts OutBcastPkts
It would make sense to add : InOctets OutOctets InMcastOctets OutMcastOctets InBcastOctets OutBcastOctets
Even if not ...
| Apr 22, 10:39 am 2009 |
| Neil Horman | Re: [PATCH] snmp: add missing counters for RFC 4293
Yep, you're right, thats the better spot for it, and I did miss the bcast
packets. I'm not sure why people keep asking me to update snmp counters. I'm
apparently very bad at it :). I'll repost soon
Neil
--
| Apr 22, 3:53 am 2009 |
| Eric Dumazet | Re: [PATCH] snmp: add missing counters for RFC 4293
Hmm... I read RFC4293 and it mentions (3.2.3. IP Statistics Tables)
(1) The HC counters and octet counters are also found at these points
but have been left out for clarity.
(1) counters are :
InReceives, InMcastPkts, OutMcastPkts, OutBcastPkts, OutTransmits
So RFC4293 tells corresponding Octets variables should be supported :
InOctets, InMcastOctets, OutMcastOctets, OutBcastOctets, OutOctets
And I dont see them in /proc/net/snmp or /proc/net/netstat
Mitsuru added :
...
| Apr 22, 2:35 am 2009 |
| Neil Horman | Re: [PATCH] snmp: add missing counters for RFC 4293
As promised, new patch, tested and ready to go. This variant puts all the stats
at the end of the IpExt stats line in /proc/net/snmp, and at the end of
/proc/net/dev_snmp6/<iface>, so it shouldn't break any readers of those files.
Also, Eric, I know you mentioned the need for OutBcastOctets, and intuitively I
thought it should be there as well, but looking at RFC 4293, [In|Out]BcastOctets
isn't defined. I started to wonder if perhaps the RFC assumed that McastOctets
was assumed to include ...
| Apr 22, 9:50 am 2009 |
| Neil Horman | Re: [PATCH] snmp: add missing counters for RFC 4293
Hey all-
New patch, taking Erics commentary pointing out my prior stupidity into
account :).
The IP MIB (RFC 4293) defines stats for InOctets, OutOctets, InMcastOctets and
OutMcastOctets:
http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc4293
But it seems we don't track those in any way that easy to separate from other
protocols. This patch adds those missing counters to the stats file. Tested
successfully by me
Signed-off-by: Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>
include/linux/snmp.h | 4 ++++
...
| Apr 21, 6:12 pm 2009 |
| David Miller | Re: INET_LRO as tristate and use from modules
From: Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>
Yes, making this a bool would be the easiest fix.
By why don't we get the same problem for PHYLIB? It's also
tristate and "select"'d by a whole slew of networking drivers.
--
| Apr 22, 2:12 am 2009 |
| David Miller | Re: [patch 0/5] [RESEND] af_iucv patches for 2.6.30-rc1
From: Ursula Braun <ursula.braun@de.ibm.com>
All applied, thanks.
--
| Apr 21, 11:46 pm 2009 |
| David Miller | Re: [PATCH] [net, 83xx] ucc_geth.c: Fix upsmr setting in ...
From: Li Yang <leoli@freescale.com>
Applied, thanks.
--
| Apr 22, 12:46 am 2009 |
| Mathieu Desnoyers | Re: [RFC PATCH] v3 RCU implementation with fast grace periods
And while we are at it : you should probably add lockdep annotation to
this new lock.
I never thought I would say this, but following the discussion going on
about netfilter locking, I am starting to think that the RCU approach
might be more simple and elegant that the nestable per-cpu rwlock
approches proposed so far. ;)
Plus, there is much fewer name calling involved in the making. :)
Cheers,
--
Mathieu Desnoyers
OpenPGP key fingerprint: 8CD5 52C3 8E3C 4140 715F BA06 3F25 A8FE ...
| Apr 22, 8:49 am 2009 |
| stefan novak | Re: bond interface arp, vlan and trunk / network question
so its a bug in kernel?
--
| Apr 22, 1:29 am 2009 |
| David Miller | Re: [PATCH]8390p: Get rid of init_module/cleanup_module
From: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>
Applied to net-next-2.6, thanks.
--
| Apr 22, 2:24 am 2009 |
| Rafael J. Wysocki | Re: [PATCH v2 fixed] e100: do not go D3 in shutdown unle ...
Please add my ACK to the patch.
Best,
Rafael
--
| Apr 22, 1:55 pm 2009 |
| Jeff Kirsher | Re: [PATCH v2 fixed] e100: do not go D3 in shutdown unle ...
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 12:37 PM, Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo
Correct, that would be overkill. If Rafael wants his Ack or
Reviewed-by added, he will let us know.
Once we have done some regression testing on the patch, I will add my
signed-off-by before sending it to Dave.
--
Cheers,
Jeff
--
| Apr 22, 1:22 pm 2009 |
| Thadeu Lima de Souza ... | Re: [PATCH v2 fixed] e100: do not go D3 in shutdown unle ...
Perhaps, Rafael should be mentioned in a Reviewed-by? As well as you if
you did review it? I guess a Tested-by and Reported-by me is overkill,
right? :-)
| Apr 22, 12:37 pm 2009 |
| Thadeu Lima de Souza ... | [PATCH v2 fixed] e100: do not go D3 in shutdown unless s ...
After experimenting with kexec with the last merges after 2.6.29, I've
had some problems when probing e100. It would not read the eeprom. After
some bisects, I realized this has been like that since forever (at least
2.6.18). The problem is that shutdown is doing the same thing that
suspend does and puts the device in D3 state. I couldn't find a way to
get the device back to a sane state in the probe function. So, based on
some similar patches from Rafael J. Wysocki for e1000, e1000e and ixgbe,
I ...
| Apr 21, 9:38 pm 2009 |
| Thadeu Lima de Souza ... | [PATCH v2] e100: do not go D3 in shutdown unless system ...
After experimenting with kexec with the last merges after 2.6.29, I've
had some problems when probing e100. It would not read the eeprom. After
some bisects, I realized this has been like that since forever (at least
2.6.18). The problem is that shutdown is doing the same thing that
suspend does and puts the device in D3 state. I couldn't find a way to
get the device back to a sane state in the probe function. So, based on
some similar patches from Rafael J. Wysocki for e1000, e1000e and ixgbe,
I ...
| Apr 21, 6:38 pm 2009 |
| Jeff Kirsher | Re: [PATCH v2 fixed] e100: do not go D3 in shutdown unle ...
On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 9:38 PM, Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo
Thanks, I will add it to my queue of patches for e100.
Also, just FYI, Auke is no longer a maintainer for
e100/e1000/e1000e/igb/ixgb/ixgbe devices, so I have removed him from
the thread.
--
Cheers,
Jeff
--
| Apr 21, 10:46 pm 2009 |
| David Miller | Re: [PATCH 2.6.29.1 1/1] 8139too: fix HW initial flow
From: Eric Dumazet <dada1@cosmosbay.com>
Applied, thanks everyone.
--
| Apr 22, 12:44 am 2009 |
| Benjamin Herrenschmidt | Re: Porting the ibm_newemac driver to use phylib (and ot ...
Yup, emac and sungem predate phylib.
I had a quick look at what it would take to port at least emac over, the
main issue was that I want to be able to sleep (ie, take a mutex) in my
mdio read/write functions, and back then, phylib wouldn't let me do that
due to spinlock and timer/softirq usage.
Ben.
--
| Apr 22, 1:21 am 2009 |
| Radu Rendec | Re: htb parallelism on multi-core platforms
Hi Jarek,
Thanks for the hints! As far as I understand, HFSC is also implemented
as a queue discipline (like HTB), so I guess it suffers from the same
design limitations (doesn't span across multiple CPUs). Is this
assumption correct?
As for htb_hysteresis I actually haven't tried it. Although it is
definitely worth a try (especially if the average traffic grows), I
don't think it can compensate multithreading / parallel execution. At
least half of a packet processing time is consumed by ...
| Apr 22, 7:02 am 2009 |
| Jesper Dangaard Brouer | Re: htb parallelism on multi-core platforms
Its runtime adjustable, so its easy to try out.
The HTB classify hash has a scalability issue in kernels below 2.6.26.
Patrick McHardy fixes that up in 2.6.26. What kernel version are you
using?
Could you explain how you do classification? And perhaps outline where you
possible scalability issue is located?
If you are interested how I do scalable classification, see my
presentation from Netfilter Workshop 2008:
http://nfws.inl.fr/en/?p=115
Yes, htb_hysteresis basically is ...
| Apr 22, 2:29 pm 2009 |
| Herbert Xu | Re: [PATCH] myr10ge: again fix lro_gen_skb() alignment
I was sure I had tested my case with the IRQs bound (using a cxgb3),
but when I tried it again today GRO was indeed slower (8G vs. 9.4G)!
I fiddled with it all day and couldn't figure out why this was
so. We weren't spending any more time in the GRO code than LRO,
and in fact we were aggregating more packets with GRO (700k segments
instead of 900k segments). GRO was also sending a lot less ACKs
than LRO.
It finally dawned on me that my sender had been upgraded from 2.6.18
to 2.6.30-rc1. ...
| Apr 22, 3:48 am 2009 |
| Andrew Gallatin | Re: [PATCH] myr10ge: again fix lro_gen_skb() alignment
Herbert Xu wrote:
>
> In the mean time, can you see if there is any disparity in the
> number of aggregated segments and ACKs between GRO and LRO?
> netstat -s should be sufficient to measure this (TCP segments
> received and sent).
I booted the sender into a kernel.org 2.6.18.2 so as to try to have
results as close to yours as possible (I was running 2.6.22 on the
sender before).
I ran 2 sets of experiments, with different CPU bindings. First
I bound the netserver and IRQ to the ...
| Apr 22, 8:37 am 2009 |
| David Miller | Re: [PATCH RFC v2] Documentation/isdn/INTERFACE.CAPI
From: Tilman Schmidt <tilman@imap.cc>
There is no INTERFACE.fax entry in this file in the current
tree.
I wanted to apply this, but aparently your patch is against
something other than Linus's tree or net-2.6
--
| Apr 22, 2:31 am 2009 |
| Karsten Keil | Re: [PATCH RFC v2] Documentation/isdn/INTERFACE.CAPI
I will send a new signed patch after review in few hours.
Thanks to Tilman for this work.
Karsten
--
| Apr 22, 3:16 am 2009 |
| Randy Dunlap | Re: [PATCH RFC v2] Documentation/isdn/INTERFACE.CAPI
zero-terminated
kernel-doc changes look good.
Nice job. Thanks.
~Randy
--
| Apr 22, 8:35 am 2009 |
| Tilman Schmidt | Re: [PATCH RFC v2] Documentation/isdn/INTERFACE.CAPI
It applies on top of my mis-dated patch
Subject: [PATCH v2] update Documentation/isdn/00-INDEX
Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2008 14:01:32 +0100
which I sent in fact on 7 Apr 2009. Somehow I thought you had
already applied that.
If it helps, I can re-send that one with the correct date, or
alternatively merge both of these patches into one.
Regards,
Tilman
--=20
Tilman Schmidt E-Mail: tilman@imap.cc
Bonn, Germany
Diese Nachricht besteht zu 100% aus wiederverwerteten ...
| Apr 22, 4:48 am 2009 |
| Sam Ravnborg | Re: [PATCH RFC v2] Documentation/isdn/INTERFACE.CAPI
Try copying Randy on the patch - he is good at reviewing documentation.
Sam
--
| Apr 22, 4:45 am 2009 |
| Greg Lindahl | Re: [PATCH] LSM: Add security_socket_post_accept() and s ...
I have no idea what you meant by a "hard" error. Note that I also
discussed EAGAIN, which appears to happen commonly historically and
today, and appears to be what the security module folks would want to
have happen and you're rejecting. Do you consider that to be a hard
error? I'm betting not.
-- greg
--
| Apr 21, 11:10 pm 2009 |
| David Miller | Re: [PATCH] LSM: Add security_socket_post_accept() and s ...
From: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp>
Do me a favor. We have mechanisms by which you can queue up packets
(even into userspace) to make policy decisions.
You can make your decision there, and if appropriate, reinject the
packet back into the kernel input processing.
This is how netfilter ip_queue allows people to implement policies
in userspace, and you could use it in the kernel and then need
none of these ugly hooks.
--
| Apr 21, 10:07 pm 2009 |
| David Miller | Re: [PATCH] LSM: Add security_socket_post_accept() and s ...
From: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp>
So what does your TOMOTO stuff do if the mapping changes again and
that incoming connection that became unacceptable is now acceptable?
We've lost the connection, and can never get it back.
These semantics don't make any sense at all, and the point at which
you make your choices here is totally arbitrary.
Read that carefully: the point at which you are making this
drop decision is arbitrary.
--
| Apr 21, 9:22 pm 2009 |
| Greg Lindahl | Re: [PATCH] LSM: Add security_socket_post_accept() and s ...
Isn't that completely different? Anyone who writes code that calls
accept() quickly finds out that in the real world it fails for all
kinds of reasons worth ignoring. As an example, a comment in ircd at
the only accept call (circa 1998):
/*
** There may be many reasons for error return, but in otherwise
** correctly working environment the probable cause is running
** out of file descriptors (EMFILE, ENFILE or others?). The
** man pages for accept don't seem to list these as ...
| Apr 21, 6:52 pm 2009 |
| David Miller | Re: [PATCH] LSM: Add security_socket_post_accept() and s ...
From: Greg Lindahl <greg@blekko.com>
I said explicitly that hard errors are allows (out of file
descriptors, memory allocation failure)
Feel free to ignore what I'm saying, and I'll feel free to
ignore you too.
--
| Apr 21, 9:23 pm 2009 |
| David Miller | Re: [PATCH] LSM: Add security_socket_post_accept() and s ...
From: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp>
We had a similar situation with read()'s on UDP sockets.
When poll() says something, it has to stick.
This is not discussable. If these semantics are "necessary", then
what you're doing is definitely misdesigned in my opinion.
--
| Apr 21, 6:14 pm 2009 |
| David Miller | Re: [PATCH] LSM: Add security_socket_post_accept() and s ...
From: Greg Lindahl <greg@blekko.com>
EAGAIN does not happen if the application calls poll(), gets
an indication that connections are available, and then
immediately calls accept() on the indicated FD.
It can only happen if it calls accept() multiple times after such a
poll() call _OR_ it does not control multi-threaded access to the
listen file descriptor.
This new behavior from TOMOYO would make accept() return -EAGAIN in
cases which are of no fault of the application. It is ...
| Apr 21, 11:46 pm 2009 |
| Tetsuo Handa | Re: [PATCH] LSM: Add security_socket_post_accept() and s ...
Why the connection gets lost? If two tasks' security settings are the same,
the process whichever reached sock->ops->accept() first will get the connetion.
If two tasks' security settings are not the same, I warned it on the patch
TOMOYO will return -ECONNABORTED, which is also returned by failure of
newsock->ops->getname().
If there were some application which can't handle accept() returning
-ECONNABORTED error, we can simply disable this filtering (by giving such
application permission to ...
| Apr 22, 12:19 am 2009 |
| David Miller | Re: [PATCH] LSM: Add security_socket_post_accept() and s ...
From: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp>
Fine.
FWIW I do not agree with TOMOYO conceptually. But if people are
generally going to let such a scheme into the kernel, I guess
I have to accept these socket layer hacks :-/
--
| Apr 21, 10:52 pm 2009 |
| David Miller | Re: [PATCH] LSM: Add security_socket_post_accept() and s ...
From: Greg Lindahl <greg@blekko.com>
It's likely a bug and should have been reported.
Unexplainable behavior isn't something to ignore.
--
| Apr 21, 11:58 pm 2009 |
| David Miller | Re: [PATCH] LSM: Add security_socket_post_accept() and s ...
From: Greg Lindahl <greg@blekko.com>
People use poll() to avoid -EAGAIN and blocking, they expect the bits
to tell them what fd's they can work on to do real work.
But this whole task_struct based security is bogus from the start.
If I dup a file descriptor for a listening socket, and accept() in the
"wrong" task, the other task has no way to accept() that connection
even if it's security settings allow it. The connection is lost
forever.
The realm of file descriptors overlaps that of ...
| Apr 21, 11:34 pm 2009 |
| Tetsuo Handa | Re: [PATCH] LSM: Add security_socket_post_accept() and s ...
To adhere what poll() said (i.e. "connections are ready" or "datagrams are
ready"), security_socket_accept() and security_socket_recvmsg() hooks must be
removed. Otherwise, LSM users cannot adhere what poll() said.
However, security_socket_accept() and security_socket_recvmsg() hooks remain
there. LSM users are already using semantics which may not adhere what poll()
said.
--
| Apr 21, 6:49 pm 2009 |
| Tetsuo Handa | Re: [PATCH] LSM: Add security_socket_post_accept() and s ...
I was suggested to use that approach in the past discussion.
I want to make policy decisions based on the "task_struct" who picks up
the connection/datagram.
The netfilter can't predict which "task_struct" will pick up the
connection/datagram. Nobody can predict it. Even security_socket_accept()
and security_socket_recvmsg() can't predict it.
If TOMOYO is allowed to make policy decisions based on the "task_struct" who
picks up the connection/datagram, the only possible approach is to ...
| Apr 21, 10:38 pm 2009 |
| Greg Lindahl | Re: [PATCH] LSM: Add security_socket_post_accept() and s ...
My point is that EAGAIN happens already. So you can't claim that
returning it in accept() breaks the interface, when it's common enough
that today's user-level network code already handles it.
I have no opinion about TOMOYO. There are many reasons other than
EAGAIN from accept() to complain about.
-- greg
--
| Apr 21, 11:41 pm 2009 |
| Tetsuo Handa | Re: [PATCH] LSM: Add security_socket_post_accept() and s ...
No application is permitted to assume that accept() returns a connection if
poll() says that connections are available even if there is an assumption that
none of sock->ops->accept(), newsock->ops->getname(), move_addr_to_user()
fails, for there is security_socket_accept() hook which can interrupt between
"poll()" and "accept()".
There is a possibility that LSM module's policy changes from "allow picking
the connection up from the listening socket" to "deny picking the connection
up from the ...
| Apr 21, 5:55 pm 2009 |
| Greg Lindahl | Re: [PATCH] LSM: Add security_socket_post_accept() and s ...
I have observed it recently and historically, and not by calling
accept() repeatedly. I don't know what you mean by "immediately" since I
don't think you're advocating race conditions; the other end can
I am suggesting that you survey actual apps. If you find that they're
all overly anal, then maybe you've learned something about EAGAIN
already happening today. I assure you that the co-worker who stuck in
the "ignore EAGAIN without logging it" only did so because he saw it
fairly frequently. ...
| Apr 21, 11:54 pm 2009 |
| Tetsuo Handa | Re: [PATCH] LSM: Add security_socket_post_accept() and s ...
TOMOYO won't keep the connection. That's fine.
TOMOYO thinks that dropping the connection/datagram is better than choking
the queue/buffer by keeping the connection/datagram for future policy changes.
I browsed the poll() logic for TCP/IPv4's listening socket.
SYSCALL_DEFINE3(poll, struct pollfd __user *, ufds, unsigned int, nfds,
long, timeout_msecs)
{
int do_sys_poll(struct pollfd __user *ufds, unsigned int nfds,
struct timespec *end_time)
{
...
| Apr 21, 10:02 pm 2009 |
| Jarek Poplawski | Re: [PATCH] netfilter: use per-cpu recursive lock (v11)
How did you find I disagree with you? There was nothing about you,
neither anything technical. Actually, I forgot to mention I agree with
Eric about your locking proposal.
Jarek P.
--
| Apr 22, 4:39 am 2009 |
| Eric Dumazet | Re: [PATCH] netfilter: use per-cpu recursive lock (v11)
Linus,
I actually sent *one* buggy patch, and you already gave your feedback and NACK.
Fine
I even relayed this to Stephen suggesting him not calling this a recursive lock.
(Note how I use 'suggesting' here)
So, what do you want from me ? Should I copy 100 times :
"I should not call it a recursive lock. I shall not invent new locking infra. I am a moron."
"I should not call it a recursive lock. I shall not invent new locking infra. I am a moron."
"I should not call it a recursive ...
| Apr 22, 9:57 am 2009 |
| Ingo Molnar | Re: [PATCH] netfilter: use per-cpu recursive lock (v11)
Btw., i didnt find Linus's reaction shocking at all, nor did i
understand it as any criticism of prior (and future) good work of
the people involved. I found it to be what it was: a forceful
(because repeated) criticism of a bad patch.
Ingo
--
| Apr 22, 10:48 am 2009 |
| Ingo Molnar | Re: [PATCH] netfilter: use per-cpu recursive lock (v11)
You might disagree with me on an honest technical basis, but note
that this kind of childish, knee-jerk reaction against dissenting
people is what gives netdev its bad reputation.
Ingo
--
| Apr 22, 4:26 am 2009 |
| Jarek Poplawski | Re: [PATCH] netfilter: use per-cpu recursive lock (v11)
On 22-04-2009 10:53, Eric Dumazet wrote:
Right, looks like 100% (Scandinavian?!) troll. I wonder where is the
admin of this mess...
Jarek P.
--
| Apr 22, 3:13 am 2009 |
| Ingo Molnar | Re: [PATCH] netfilter: use per-cpu recursive lock (v11)
Again ... i dont know this code well, but you yourself describe it
as "a_central_and_damn_rwlock" above.
"Central and damn" locks of any type, anywhere tend to cause such
trouble.
Often they are mini-BKL's in the making. Here's some historic
patterns:
1- First there's a convenient lock around a popular and useful
piece of data and code.
2- As popularity (and reach of code) grows, and some non-trivial
interaction ensues, a little bit of self-recursion is added to
...
| Apr 22, 4:18 am 2009 |
| Jarek Poplawski | Re: [PATCH] netfilter: use per-cpu recursive lock (v11)
Linus Torvalds wrote, On 04/22/2009 07:18 PM:
Very funny! For newbies only: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Troll_(Internet)
Actually, I admit you could be the best "Ozzy" Osbourne imposter instead.
Jarek P.
--
| Apr 22, 1:46 pm 2009 |
| Paul E. McKenney | Re: [PATCH] netfilter: use per-cpu recursive lock (v13)
Looks good from a concurrency viewpoint!
This is very good -- gets rid of problems with preemption nesting
depth limitations and lockdep limitations. In addition, it gets rid of
the period of time during which all packet processing might otherwise
be blocked. Not a big deal on a small machine, but could be a real
problem on a large one.
Good, you do indeed need to prevent migration before you acquire this
CPU's lock. Otherwise, you could have more than one CPU attempting to
Good. ...
| Apr 21, 9:17 pm 2009 |
| Eric Dumazet | Re: [PATCH] netfilter: use per-cpu recursive lock (v13)
Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <dada1@cosmosbay.com>
Tested today on various machines and no problem so far
tbench/oprofile results, 3.7236% cpu spent in ipt_do_table, and 0.84% used
on read_lock/read_unlock
c04a5c30 <ipt_do_table>: /* ipt_do_table total: 217134 3.7236 */
...
349 0.0060 :c04a5ccc: call c04ce380 <_read_lock>
23914 0.4101 :c04a5cd1: mov 0xc(%edi),%eax
...
:c04a5ecb: call c04ce5f0 <_read_unlock_bh>
25279 0.4335 :c04a5ed0: cmpb ...
| Apr 22, 7:57 am 2009 |
| Eric Dumazet | Re: [PATCH] netfilter: use per-cpu recursive lock (v11)
The netfilter case is real simple Ingo, (note I did not use "obvious" here ;) )
netfilter in 2.6.2[0-9] used :
CPU 1
sofirq handles one packet from a NIC
ipt_do_table() /* to handle INPUT table for example, or FORWARD */
read_lock_bh(&a_central_and_damn_rwlock)
... parse rules
-> calling some netfilter sub-function
re-entering network IP stack to send some packet (say a RST packet)
...
ipt_do_table() /* to handle OUPUT table rules for example */
...
| Apr 22, 1:53 am 2009 |
| Linus Torvalds | Re: [PATCH] netfilter: use per-cpu recursive lock (v11)
Actually, the thing is, I don't even think your original patch was even
buggy. The bug crept in later. I NAK'ed it not because it was buggy, but
because of the ad-hoc'ness and the naming. Really.
And I actually even said so in my original rant:
'The fact that code "happens to work by mistake" (and I'm not saying that
your does - but it might just because of the per-cpu'ness of it [..]'
because your original patch still had the
rcu_read_lock_bh();
in place before the ...
| Apr 22, 10:18 am 2009 |
| Linus Torvalds | Re: [PATCH] netfilter: use per-cpu recursive lock (v11)
You don't _understand_ do you?
There is a huge difference between recursive code, and a recursive lock.
The netfilter code may need to occasionally re-enter itself. Nobody ever
contested _that_ part.
What I have disagreed with the whole time is
(a) doing local ad-hoc locking primitives without any comments
what-so-ever.
(b) Doing them _wrong_ in many cases
(c) Calling the _lock_ a "recursive" lock.
The fact that a lock works with recursion doesn't make it ...
| Apr 22, 8:19 am 2009 |
| Ingo Molnar | Re: [PATCH] netfilter: use per-cpu recursive lock (v11)
You make it quite hard to give reasonable feedback to your code :-/
First you attack me personally here, then - 30 minutes later - in
the next iteration of your patch, you do:
+ /* wait for each other cpu to see new table */
+ for_each_possible_cpu(i)
+ if (i != smp_processor_id()) {
+ xt_info_wrlock(i);
+ xt_info_wrunlock(i);
+ }
... which i have not seen in your previous patch and which looks ...
| Apr 22, 1:00 am 2009 |
| Linus Torvalds | Re: [PATCH] netfilter: use per-cpu recursive lock (v13)
Ack on the code.
But the comment is _still_ crap. Please update. It's not a recursive lock,
as clearly shown by the code itself. It's a per-cpu read-write lock, and
only the reader is "recursive" (but that's how read-write locks with in
Linux, and that has nothing to do with anything).
So make the explanations match the code and the intent. Write it something
like
This version of x_tables (ip/ip6/arp) locking uses a per-cpu
reader-writer lock lock where the readers can ...
| Apr 22, 8:32 am 2009 |
| Ingo Molnar | Re: [PATCH] netfilter: use per-cpu recursive lock (v11)
Yeah, indeed.
I wasnt really concentrating on the nested case, i was concentrating
on the scalability and lock nesting angle. I think the code
submitted here looks rather incestous in that regard.
Allowing nested locking _on the same CPU_ is asking for trouble. Use
short critical sections and if there's any exclusion needed, use an
Yeah, this looks IRQ-nesting safe. But i really have to ask: why
does this code try so hard to allow same-CPU nesting?
Nesting on the same CPU is ...
| Apr 22, 12:35 am 2009 |
| Andreas Schwab | Re: Oops in tun: bisected to Limit amount of queued pac ...
Any news on this? It is still badly broken in 2.6.30-rc3.
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, schwab@linux-m68k.org
GPG Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
"And now for something completely different."
--
| Apr 22, 1:34 pm 2009 |
| Martin Josefsson | Re: [PATCH] Software receive packet steering
I've been toying with the irqbalancer idea as well.
Set the number of software "queues" high and have a mapping table of
queue->cpu and then let irqbalanced which has knowledge of cpu cache
hirarchy etc balance the load by changing the mapping table as it sees
fit.
This would make it fairly fine grained so that it could work reasonably
well even if you have very few but very performance demanding clients.
Having "collisions" in the queues in that situation isn't very good.
/Martin
--
| Apr 22, 7:33 am 2009 |
| Tom Herbert | Re: [PATCH] Software receive packet steering
We are doing the pre-demux, and it works well. The additional benefit
is that the hash result or the the sk itself could be cached in the
skb for the upper layer protocol.
One caveat though is that if the device provides a hash, ie. Toeplitz,
we really want to use that in the CPU look-up to avoid the cache miss
on the header. We considered using the Toeplitz hash as the inet
hash, but it's incredibly expensive to do in software being about 20x
slower than inet_ehashfn is best we could do. ...
| Apr 22, 8:46 am 2009 |
| David Miller | Re: [PATCH] Software receive packet steering
From: Tom Herbert <therbert@google.com>
Yes, out of order packet processing is a serious issue.
There are some things I've been brainstorming about.
One thought I keep coming back to is the hack the block layer
is using right now. It remembers which CPU a block I/O request
comes in on, and it makes sure the completion runs on that
cpu too.
We could remember the cpu that the last socket level operation
occurred upon, and use that as a target for packets. This requires a
bit of ...
| Apr 22, 2:21 am 2009 |
| Jesper Dangaard Brouer | Re: [PATCH] Software receive packet steering
This is also very important for routing performance.
Experiences from practical 10GbE routing tests (done by Roberts team and
my self), reveals that we can only achieve (close to) 10Gbit/s routing
performance when carefully making sure that the rx-queue and tx-queue runs
on the same CPU. (Not doing so really kills performance).
Currently I'm using some patches by Jens L
| Apr 22, 1:44 pm 2009 |
| Rick Jones | Re: [PATCH] Software receive packet steering
Does poll on the socket touch all that many cachelines, or are you thinking of it
For what it is worth, at the 5000 foot description level that is exactly what
HP-UX 11.X does and calls TOPS (Thread Optimized Packet Scheduling). Where the
socket was last accessed is stashed away (in the socket/stream structure) and
that is looked-up when the driver hands the packet up the stack. It was done
that way in HP-UX 11.X because we found that simply hashing the headers (what
HP-UX 10.20 called ...
| Apr 22, 11:49 am 2009 |
| Chris Friesen | Re: 2.6.29-git13: Reported regressions from 2.6.28
Yeah, given the above the app was broken. We just didn't run into any
cases where the assumption caused any problems.
Also, it's not so much that we were relying on the offset value for
anything, so much as we were parsing the file and had made some
assumptions about valid offsets for anonymous memory.
Anyways, we'll fix it going forward to simply ignore the offset for
anonymous memory.
Chris
--
| Apr 22, 12:32 pm 2009 |
| previous day | today | next day |
|---|---|---|
| April 21, 2009 | April 22, 2009 | April 23, 2009 |
