Re: [PATCH] LSM: Add security_socket_post_accept() and security_socket_post_recv_datagram().

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Greg Lindahl
Date: Tuesday, April 21, 2009 - 11:41 pm

On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 11:34:03PM -0700, David Miller wrote:


My point is that EAGAIN happens already. So you can't claim that
returning it in accept() breaks the interface, when it's common enough
that today's user-level network code already handles it.

I have no opinion about TOMOYO. There are many reasons other than
EAGAIN from accept() to complain about.

-- greg

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[PATCH 2/2] tomoyo: Add network access control support., Tetsuo Handa, (Wed Apr 15, 3:51 am)
Re: [PATCH] LSM: Add security_socket_post_accept() and sec ..., Greg Lindahl, (Tue Apr 21, 11:41 pm)